Abstract 324P
Background
Cancer being a lethal disease, delay in treatment may be fatal. International organizations have come up with useful guidelines for cancer management. Still the availability of resources, infrastructure, state health policy, COVID incidence and approach of healthcare professionals differ. This study aims to find out the perception and approaches of Indian oncologists - which might prove to be useful in nation specific delivery of cancer care during COVID Pandemic.
Methods
After taking consent, a survey form was circulated online amongst oncologists (haemato/ radiation/ medical/ surgical) across the country and responses collected.
Results
79.2% oncologists represent private sector, 16.8% government sector. 50% oncologists were willing to postpone investigations for stable cancer patients. 42.6% willing to start treatment without knowing the COVID status, while 44.6% were against the idea and 12.9% were indecisive. 73% willing to perform surgery right away for operable nonemergency cases with a negative COVID status and rest 27 % willing to postpone surgery. Concurrent Chemoradiation (57%) was preferred over sequential approach (43%). Majority (53.5%) were comfortable prescribing chemotherapy via telemedicine. Asymptomatic COVID positive patients requiring chemotherapy 64.4% were willing to wait for the virus to resolve and then start therapy and 35.6% were suggesting some form of oral therapy and ongoing isolation. 89.1% preferred oral route if option present. 83.7 % preferred targeted therapy, 8.2% immunotherapy and rest went for other options. 93.1 % preferred day care chemotherapy during COVID and not admission. 61 % thought extended course of dexamethasone given as premedication during chemotherapy did not have a protective role for patients during COVID outbreak. Treatment initiation criteria in descending order - 39.6% stage of the disease, 36.6 % performance status, 22.8% COVID status and for rest it was the cost. 91% oncologists thought nurses were at a higher risk of exposure to COVID infection than the doctors. 54.5% were not taking anti COVID prophylaxis..
Conclusions
Greater homogeneity in practice was noticed amongst oncologists of a developing nation during COVID outbreak. The above information might be useful in policy making.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
183P - Textbook outcome as a measure of surgical quality assessment and prognosis in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large multicenter sample analysis
Presenter: You-Xin Gao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
184P - Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival after R0 resection for stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma: An international multicenter study
Presenter: Bin-Bin Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
185P - Effect of sarcopenia on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric neuroendocrine tumour after radical surgery: Results from a large, two-institutional series
Presenter: Ling-Qian Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
186P - Characterization of the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour patient journey
Presenter: George Fisher Jr
Session: e-Poster Display Session
187P - More is not always better: A multicenter study in lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Qi-Yue Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
188P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among pancreatic cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Billy Susanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
189P - Prognostic value of inflammation-based score for patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)
Presenter: Takahiro Yamamura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
190P - Outcomes from the Asian region of the phase III APACT trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) alone for patients (pts) with resected pancreatic cancer (PC)
Presenter: Joon Oh Park
Session: e-Poster Display Session
191P - First-line liposomal irinotecan + 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results from a phase I/II study
Presenter: Andrew Dean
Session: e-Poster Display Session
192P - A multicenter crossover analysis of first and second-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to pancreatic cancer patients: Results from the NAPOLEON study
Presenter: Kenta Nio
Session: e-Poster Display Session