Abstract 342P
Background
Palonosetron (PALO) is a second generation 5HT-3 receptor antagonist recommended as a preferred drug for high-emetogenic chemotherapies. PALO 0.25 mg has been reported to be as effective as 0.75 mg with less adverse events, such as constipation, when used alone or in combination with dexamethasone (DEX). The efficacy and safety of PALO 0.25 mg compared to 0.75 mg in combination with aprepitant (APR) plus DEX in patients (pts) with esophageal cancer remain unclear.
Methods
We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of PALO 0.25 mg versus 0.75 mg in combination with APR plus DEX in pts with localized or metastatic esophageal cancer who received cisplatin (CDDP)-containing chemotherapy between Nov. 2015 and Mar. 2017 at our institution. Complete response was defined as no emetic episodes and no rescue medication use.
Results
This study enrolled 58 and 55 pts who received PALO 0.25 mg and 0.75 mg. The baseline characteristics were similar between both groups. Sixteen (28%) and 24 (44%) pts received triplet regimen (docetaxel, CDDP and 5-fluorouracil), respectively. The complete response rates were 72% for 0.25 mg and 62% for 0.75 mg, with no significant difference (odds ratio [OR] = 0.62, p = 0.23). Percentages of no nausea was also similar with 40% and 33%, respectively (OR = 0.74, p = 0.44). Grade 2-3 constipation and any grade of aspartate aminotransferase increase were more frequently observed in 0.75 mg group (38% vs. 58%, p < 0.05; 7% vs. 22%, p < 0.05). In univariate and multivariate analyses, no association between baseline characteristics, including dose of PALO, and complete response rate was observed. Meanwhile, PALO 0.75 mg, older age, localized disease, and tobacco consumption were significantly associated with grade 2 or more constipation (OR = 0.28, p < 0.01; OR = 0.28, p < 0.01; OR = 3.09, p < 0.05; OR = 0.27, p < 0.05).
Conclusions
PALO 0.25 mg in combination with APR plus DEX may contributed to the decrease in constipation in pts with esophageal cancer who received CDDP-containing chemotherapy without compromising the anti-emetic effect compared to 0.75 mg.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
National Cancer Center.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
Y. Nakamura: Research grant/Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical. H. Taniguchi: Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Honoraria (self): Chugai; Honoraria (self): Taiho Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self): Lilly Japan; Honoraria (self): Merck Serono; Honoraria (self): Yakult Honsha; Honoraria (self): MBL; Honoraria (self): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Honoraria (self): Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma; Honoraria (self): Nippon Kayaku; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sumitomo-Dainippon Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Array BioPharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD Oncology; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sysmex. T. Kojima: Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant/Funding (institution): Astellas Amgen BioPharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugaiseiyaku; Research grant/Funding (institution): Parexel; Research grant/Funding (institution): Shionogi; Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb Company; Advisory/Consultancy: Merck Biopharma; Honoraria (self): Oncolys BioPharma. T. Yoshino: Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugai; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): Daiichi-Sankyo; Research grant/Funding (institution): Parexel International; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (institution): GlaxoSmithKline. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
123P - The clinical value of prognostic nutritional index in esophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma patients with anastomotic leakage after surgery
Presenter: Yan Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
124P - Prospective evaluation of pattern of care and quality of life in patients undergoing esophagectomy at a high-volume regional cancer centre in South India
Presenter: Faheem Abdulla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
125P - Analysis of esophageal cancer incidence for last 20 years in Uzbekistan
Presenter: Abrorjon Yusupbekov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
126P - A phase II study of rh-endostatin combined with irinotecan plus cisplatin as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC)
Presenter: Jianhua Chang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
128P - Clinical update with plasma and tumour-based genomic analyses in expansion part of phase I study of selective FGFR inhibitor E7090
Presenter: Chigusa Morizane
Session: e-Poster Display Session
129P - Exploration of the best candidates for splenic hilar lymph node dissection (No.10 LND) based on long-term survival: Stage IIIA proximal gastric cancer may benefit from No.10 LND
Presenter: Zu-Kai Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
130P - Reappraisal of the role of no. 10 lymphadenectomy for proximal gastric cancer in the era of minimal invasive surgery during total gastrectomy: A pooled analysis of 4 prospective trials
Presenter: Qing Zhong
Session: e-Poster Display Session
131P - Prognostic value of tumour regression grading (TRG) in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery for gastric cancer
Presenter: Jian-Wei Xie
Session: e-Poster Display Session
132P - Impact of increasing age on cancer- and noncancer-specific mortality in patients with gastric cancer treated by radical surgery: A competing risk analysis
Presenter: Long-Long Cao
Session: e-Poster Display Session