Abstract 436P
Background
AYA melanomas (diagnosed 16-39 years) are rare but rising in incidence. It is not well-understood how they differ from adult melanomas. We aim to describe the demographics, clinic-molecular characteristics and outcomes from our institution.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed all melanoma patients diagnosed between 16 and 39 years old (y) who presented to the National Cancer Centre Singapore from 1 January 2000 to 31 March 2019.
Results
There were 74 patients (41 females, 33 males). 51.4% (n=38) were Chinese, 9.5% Caucasians, 6.8% Malays and the rest of other ethnicity. Across age groups, 9 patients were 16-23 y (12.2%); 26 between 24-31y (35.1%) and 39 between 32-39y (52.7%). The most common subtype was cutaneous melanoma (46%, n=34). 31 (41.9%) patients had BRAF testing. 46.4% (n=13) had BRAF V600E mutation and 1 had BRAF V600K. 20 (27.0%) were tested for cKIT, with none having mutations. 51.4% (n=38) had stage I/II disease (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th Edition), 16 with stage III and 10 had stage IV. Common metastatic sites were lungs, lymph nodes and liver. 25 (33.8%) patients had sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx), with 5 having lymph node dissection. Among those with SLNBx, 4, 13 and 5 patients had Breslow depths of <1mm, 1-4mm and >4mm respectively. The median depth was 2.7mm (range 0.25–9mm). 7 (9.5%) had first-line systemic therapy, with 5 (2 stage IV; 2 stage III and 1 unknown) receiving immunotherapy. 2 (stage IV) had combination chemotherapy (Dacarbazine/Cisplatin and Paclitaxel/Bevacizumab/Caroboplatin). None received BRAF inhibitors. The median overall survival (OS) is 2.7y (range 0.1–17.7y) for all and 1y for metastatic disease. The 5y OS is 34.5%. The breakdown is shown in the table. Table: 436P
Survival by age and stage
Number | Median OS | p-value | |
16-23y | 9 | 4.53 | =0.15 |
24-31y | 26 | 4.15 | |
32-39y | 39 | 2.51 | |
Stage I-III | 54 | 3.25 | <0.001 |
Stage IV | 10 | 1.01 |
Conclusions
Routine BRAF/cKIT testing commenced in 2010 and immunotherapy started only in 2017, contributing to outcomes we see. Poorer survival is associated with higher stage (p<0.001). Further studies are needed to elucidate potential biological and cancer-specific differences between AYAs and adult melanoma population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
183P - Textbook outcome as a measure of surgical quality assessment and prognosis in gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma: A large multicenter sample analysis
Presenter: You-Xin Gao
Session: e-Poster Display Session
184P - Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict recurrence-free survival after R0 resection for stage II/III gastric adenocarcinoma: An international multicenter study
Presenter: Bin-Bin Xu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
185P - Effect of sarcopenia on short- and long-term outcomes of patients with gastric neuroendocrine tumour after radical surgery: Results from a large, two-institutional series
Presenter: Ling-Qian Wang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
186P - Characterization of the gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumour patient journey
Presenter: George Fisher Jr
Session: e-Poster Display Session
187P - More is not always better: A multicenter study in lymphadenectomy during gastrectomy for gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma
Presenter: Qi-Yue Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
188P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among pancreatic cancer patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Billy Susanto
Session: e-Poster Display Session
189P - Prognostic value of inflammation-based score for patients treated with FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP)
Presenter: Takahiro Yamamura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
190P - Outcomes from the Asian region of the phase III APACT trial of adjuvant nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (nab-P/G) vs gemcitabine (G) alone for patients (pts) with resected pancreatic cancer (PC)
Presenter: Joon Oh Park
Session: e-Poster Display Session
191P - First-line liposomal irinotecan + 5 fluorouracil/leucovorin + oxaliplatin in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results from a phase I/II study
Presenter: Andrew Dean
Session: e-Poster Display Session
192P - A multicenter crossover analysis of first and second-line FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel administered to pancreatic cancer patients: Results from the NAPOLEON study
Presenter: Kenta Nio
Session: e-Poster Display Session