Abstract 279P
Background
Oral cavity cancer with the masticator space involvement is considered as very advanced localised disease and staged as T4b in AJCC 8th edition, along with the involvement carotid artery, base of skull or prevertebral fascia. NCCN treatment guidelines consider this as inoperable disease and advocate non-surgical options or palliative treatment. This study intends to compare the different treatment modalities in T4b oral cavity cancer and their impact on survival.
Methods
This is a retrospective study of 150 patients with T4b oral cavity cancer, from 2013 to 2015 and follow up data till 31st July 2019 were collected. All patients had biopsy-proven SCC and CT evidence of masticator space involvement.
Results
Total of 150 patients were included. 102 patients had received curative treatment and 48 patients had received palliative treatment. 30% in the curative group and 42% in the palliative group were supra notch disease. In the curative group 84% were treated with surgery and adjuvant treatment, and the remaining had received RT with or without chemotherapy. 90% patients in the surgically treated group had attained margin negative resection. 4-year OS in the curatively treated group was 58.9% and in the palliative group was 12%. 2-year OS was 69% and 31% respectively, (p=0.001). The survival of supra notch disease was not different from infra notch disease either in the curative group (61% v/s 57%, p=0.452) or in the palliative group (10% v/s 14%, p=0.13). The surgically treated patients in the curative arm had significant survival advantage over the patients who had received only RT with or without chemotherapy, (63.5% v/s 34%, p=0.001).
Conclusions
Curatively treated oral cavity cancer with masticator space involvement has good survival outcome. Clinicopathological spectrum of supra notch disease is not different from infra notch disease, and their prognosis is similar to infra notch disease, if margin-negative resection is attained. Radical intent treatment, preferably surgery should be offered to all patients with masticator space involvement, if negative margin is anticipated from preoperative imaging.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Director, RCC, Trivandrum.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session