Abstract 261P
Background
While the expected survival of patients with FL almost reaches that of the normal population, the outcomes of patients who experience early progression within 24 months, that is, POD24 is dismal. Unlike the West, FL is less frequent in Asia as it accounts about 10% of non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. To define outcomes and treatment patterns FL patients who experienced POD24 in Korea, we performed a multicenter, retrospective analysis.
Methods
The inclusion criteria were as follows, 1) Histologically confirmed diagnosis of FL grade 1, 2, and 3A; 2) Documented POD24. The primary endpoint was OS from the first diagnosis of FL.
Results
Between 2007 to 2019, a total of 73 cases were eligible for analysis. Median age at diagnosis was 53 (range, 28 – 83). All patients were Asians. In terms of FLIPI-1 risk group, 14 (19.2%), 24 (32.9%), and 35 (47.9%) patients were categorized as low-, intermediate-, and high-risk group, respectively. Sixty-two patients (84.9%) had received rituximab as the induction treatment, and 11 patients (15.1%) had not. CVP was the most commonly used regimen (N=40), followed by CHOP (N = 26). Forty-four patients (60.3%) had received maintenance treatment with rituximab and 29 patients (39.7%) had not.
POD24 was documented after a median duration of 11.6 months. Rituximab wad administered in 19 patients, and platinum-based regimens (N = 23) were the most commonly used backbone treatment followed by bendamustine (N = 15) and fludarabine-based regimens (N = 12). PFS from the first progression was 23.7 months. The median OS was 128.9 mo, with the 5-year being 75.2%. OS did not significantly differ by the re-induction regimen, use of rituximab, or SCT.
When we compared these patients to our previous cohort in which 191 FL patients without POD24 were included, the 5-year survival rate was significantly inferior in the current cohort (75.2% vs. 95.7%, p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The 5-year OS rate of our patients with POD24 seems better than Western data, although there are many confounding factors including baseline FLIPI and the induction treatment. As expected, the 5-year OS rate of patient with POD24 was inferior to that of patients without POD24. To best salvage these patients, further studies are warranted to develop effective treatment.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session