Abstract 27P
Background
Breast cancer prognostic factors vary from pathological grades, hormonal sensitivity, stage and LN metastasis. Results from recent studies discuss primary location as survival indicator but its significance still unclear. With SEER database registry in place, a rich source for data collection with differentiating breast cancer sites and primary location. With analysis of these data, the effect of cancer's primary origin on breast cancer survivorship would be more comprehensive.
Methods
Using SEER*stat 8.3.6 program, Based on Incidence - SEER Research Data, 9 Registries, Nov 2019 Sub (1975-2017), patients diagnosed with breast cancer (site recode ICD-O-3) between 1975-2017 are selected. Case listing session was done with extraction patients year of diagnosis, survival time in months, laterality, and primary site. Cox regression was done using IBM SPSS statistics 25. p-value <0.001 is considered significant.
Results
720272 patients were involved in analysis (50.9% left:49.1% right origin of primary). Median survival time for the cohort was 185 months(95% CI:184.4:185.5). Left side malignancy showed a significantly less positive effect on survival than right originated ones (HR, 0.988; 95% CI, 0.982–0.995). The upper and lower inner quadrants show a significantly higher effect on survival (HR, 1.877; 95% CI, 1.797–1.960) and 1.761(1.685). (HR, 1.761; 95% CI, 1.685–:1.842) respectively P-value <0.001. Table: 27P
P-value | HR | 95.0% CI for HR | ||
Lower | Upper | |||
Nipple | Reference | |||
Central portion of breast | <0.001 | 1.454 | 1.391 | 1.521 |
Upper-inner quadrant of breast | <0.001 | 1.877 | 1.797 | 1.960 |
Lower-inner quadrant of breast | <0.001 | 1.761 | 1.685 | 1.842 |
Upper-outer quadrant of breast | <0.001 | 1.567 | 1.501 | 1.635 |
Lower-outer quadrant of breast | <0.001 | 1.711 | 1.637 | 1.788 |
Axillary tail of breast | <0.001 | 1.142 | 1.078 | 1.211 |
Overlapping lesion of breast | <0.001 | 1.680 | 1.610 | 1.754 |
Breast, NOS | <0.001 | 1.350 | 1.293 | 1.410 |
Hazard ratios for primary site of breast cancer: Cox regression analysis Optimal cut-offs were determined with a maximal chi-square method.HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval; NOS: not otherwise specified
Conclusions
Upper and lower inner quadrants show the best survival for patients diagnosed with breast cancer. The primary site of malignancy in breast cancer appears to be a good predictive value of survival and can be used as a rough method to predict patients` prognosis. More Data extraction, analysis, and interpretation of overall and cause-specific survival are recommended for more knowledge about the primary site in depth.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Mohamed Alaa Gouda.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
164P - The impact of sarcopenia on chemotherapy toxicity and survival rate among hepatocellular carcinoma patients who underwent chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Elizabeth Marcella
Session: e-Poster Display Session
165P - Prognostic factors in sorafenib-treated hepatocellular carcinoma: Multicentre analysis of a European population sample
Presenter: João Gramaça
Session: e-Poster Display Session
166P - Differences and similarities in presentation and management patterns in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) across Hong Kong, Singapore and Thailand
Presenter: Pierce Chow
Session: e-Poster Display Session
167P - Epidemiology of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in tertiary level hospitals in Bangladesh
Presenter: Abdullah Al Mamun Khan
Session: e-Poster Display Session
168P - Response assessments in hepatocellular carcinoma: What are the best criteria to utilize? mRECIST or RECIST 1.1? A retrospective meta-analysis of multiple phase III trials
Presenter: Oliver Bohnsack
Session: e-Poster Display Session
169P - IMbrave150: Management of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) for atezolizumab (atezo) and bevacizumab (bev) in unresectable HCC
Presenter: Masatoshi Kudo
Session: e-Poster Display Session
170P - Sintilimab plus anlotinib as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC)
Presenter: Xiaofeng Chen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
171P - Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib versus TACE plus sorafenib for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumour thrombus (PVTT): A prospective randomized study
Presenter: Xiaoyan Ding
Session: e-Poster Display Session
172P - Triple combination therapy of lenvatinib, toripalimab, and hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma
Presenter: Zhi-Cheng Lai
Session: e-Poster Display Session
173P - Regorafenib in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in real-world practice in Asia: Interim results from the observational REFINE study
Presenter: Ho Yeong Lim
Session: e-Poster Display Session