Abstract 433P
Background
Previous researches have reported on the protective effect of aspirin on different types of cancers. However, evidence from observational studies can be biased by multiple confounding factors. Also, it remains unclear whether aspirin use is casually related to a decreased cancer risk. Consequently, we conducted Mendelian randomization analyses, using single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) as instrumental variables to investigate the casual effect of aspirin on different types of cancers.
Methods
Mendelian randomization analyses were conducted using pooled statistics from corresponding researches and several large-scale consortia. Inverse-variance weighted, MR-Egger and weighted median methods were utilized to evaluate the possible causal relationship between aspirin and the observed reduction in cancer risk. Results were shown by odds ratios (OR) and their corresponding 95% CIs. Analyses were conducted using the package “TwoSampleMR” in R.
Results
A total of 19 cancers corresponding to 344,392 cases and 5,424,758 controls were included in the final analysis. In contrast to the lower risk for various cancer types reported in conventional observational studies, our MR results only showed a decreased risk in lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) 0.0418; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.0031-0.5638; P=0.0168] and squamous cell lung cancer [OR=0.002; 95% CI 1.2145×10-5-0.3009; P=0.0153]. Insignificant results were observed in other types of cancers including lung adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, colon cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, esophageal cancer, oral cancer, pancreas cancer, rectal cancer, malignant melanoma, non-melanoma skin cancer, Hodgkin’s lymphoma as well as non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.
Conclusions
The potential effect of aspirin in cancer prevention still needs to be interpreted with cautions and aspirin is still too early to be recommended as a universal chemoprotective agent for primary cancer prevention. Further randomized controlled trials with a more rigorous design are warranted in the future.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
61P - Clinical implication of BRCA mutation in breast cancer with central nervous system metastasis
Presenter: Jwa Hoon Kim
Session: e-Poster Display Session
62P - IGF axis in breast cancer recurrence and metastasis
Presenter: Hajara Akhter
Session: e-Poster Display Session
63P - Butterfly pea (<italic>Clitoria ternatea</italic> Linn.) flower extract prevents MCF-7 HER2-positive breast cancer cell metastasis in-vitro
Presenter: Azzahra Asysyifa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
64P - Pre-treatment absolute white blood cell profile count as metastatic predictive factors in invasive ductal carcinoma breast cancer
Presenter: Wikania I Gede
Session: e-Poster Display Session
65P - The new mouse anti-nNav1.5 monoclonal antibody
Presenter: Nur Aishah Sharudin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
66P - The TILs near solid structures is a potential prognostic factor of distant metastases in the luminal HER2-negative breast cancer
Presenter: Vladimir Alifanov
Session: e-Poster Display Session
73P - Selinexor in combination with carboplatin and pemetrexed (CP) in patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors: Results of an open label, single-center, multi-arm phase Ib study
Presenter: Kyaw Thein
Session: e-Poster Display Session
74P - Comprehensive transcriptome analysis of endoplasmic reticulum stress in osteosarcomas
Presenter: Yoshiyuki Suehara
Session: e-Poster Display Session
75P - The evaluation of selective sensitivity of EZH2 inhibitors based on synthetic lethality in ARID1A-deficient gastric cancer
Presenter: Leo Yamada
Session: e-Poster Display Session
76P - Targeted tumour photoImmunotherapy against triple-negative breast cancer therapy
Presenter: Vivek Raju
Session: e-Poster Display Session