Abstract 295P
Background
During the last two decades, health-related quality of life (QoL) measurements have been an important issue in understanding the difficulties perceived in many diseases. It is important to assess the health-related quality of life to know the extent of diseases and conditions affecting individual’s general well-being. Studies have shown the effect various determinants of Quality of Life (QoL) in lung cancer patients. This study was done to assess the QoL in individuals with non- small cell lung cancer undergoing palliative care.
Methods
Materials and Method: Data on QoL were collected using a modified MOS-SF form-32. The study was done in 27 individuals before and after providing supportive or palliative care. A random mixed linear model was used to assess impact of palliative care on Quality of Life with Physical Health Summary score and Mental Health Summary score as main outcomes. All the possible confounding factors were controlled in the study.
Results
When values were compared before and after giving palliative care the Physical Health Summary score decreased considerably. (diff=-2.12; 95% CI: [-4.08, -0.63]) with small to medium effect sizes. The PHS Score remained lower after being on palliative care for more than 2 years (diff=-5.86; 95% CI: [-7.89, -3.63]).]). The Mental Health summary score didn’t change significantly after giving palliative care (diff=-5.86; 95% CI: [-7.89, -3.63]). The Mental Health summary score was higher after HAART for more than 5 years when compared prior to infection.
Conclusions
Quality of life is an important determinant in the course of lung cancer. Palliative or supportive care can play a vital role in improving the quality of life in patients with lung cancer.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The author.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
The author has declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
133P - Which patient subgroup needs more attention in early treatment failure? A matched cohort study of treatment failure patterns in locally advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Dong Wu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
134P - Effect of preoperative tumour under-staging on the long-term survival of patients undergoing radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer
Presenter: Mi Lin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
135P - Significance of lymphatic invasion in the indication for additional gastrectomy after endoscopic treatment
Presenter: Hirohito Fujikawa
Session: e-Poster Display Session
136P - Modified ypTNM staging classification for gastric cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A multi-institutional study
Presenter: Wen-Wu Qiu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
137P - Clinical utility of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in resectable gastric cancer (GC)
Presenter: Mikhail Fedyanin
Session: e-Poster Display Session
138P - Prognostic importance of dynamic changes in systemic inflammatory markers for patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ying-Qi Huang
Session: e-Poster Display Session
139P - An intraoperative model for predicting survival and deciding therapeutic schedules: A comprehensive analysis of peritoneal metastasis in patients with advanced gastric cancer
Presenter: Zhi-Yu Liu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
140P - Preoperative and postoperative C-reactive protein levels predict recurrence and chemotherapy benefit in gastric cancer
Presenter: Li-Li Shen
Session: e-Poster Display Session
141P - Low expression of CDK5RAP3 and UFM1 indicates poor prognosis in patients with gastric cancer
Presenter: Ning-Zi Lian
Session: e-Poster Display Session
142P - Prognostic analysis of patients with intra-abdominal infectious complications after laparoscopy and open radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A propensity score-matching analysis
Presenter: Si-Jin Que
Session: e-Poster Display Session