Abstract 401P
Background
Afatinib is an efiective treatment for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, its toxicities often require dose modifications. The aim of this study was to assess the eficacy and safety of low dose afatinib monotherapy in patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.
Methods
This study was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label phase II trial. Treatment-naïve patients with advanced NSCLC positive for common EGFR mutations received afatinib in a dose of 20mg/day. The same dose was continued unless the tumor had grown. The primary endpoint (PE) was progression-free survival (PFS) The threshold median PFS was 9.2 months and the expected median PFS 13.8 months.
Results
From March 2017 through September 2018, 53 patients were enrolled from 21 institutions in Japan. The median age was 70 years (range, 37–85), and 28 patients (52.8%) were women. EGFR mutation subtypes included exon 19 deletion (56.6%) and L858R point mutation (43.4%). Most patients had a performance status of 0 or 1 (86.8%). As of the data cut-ofi date of March 2020, the median follow-up was 20.8 months. The median PFS, time to treatment failure and overall survival were 12.6 months (95% CI: 9.7–14.3), 18.6 months (95%CI: 16.0-21.2) and not reached. The PE was met. The objective response and the disease control were 66.6% (95% CI: 51.7-78.5) and 92.5% (95% CI: 81.8-97.9). Adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher occurred in 12 patients (22.6%) including diarrhea in 4 patients (7.5%) that was lower than that observed in phase III studies of afatinib using 40 mg. Eight of 19 patients (42.1%) had T790M resistant mutation in plasma and tissues. Afatinib plasma concentrations at 9 days after the start of administration had no correlations with clinical outcomes and AEs including diarrhea.
Conclusions
Low dose afatinib would be considered as one of standard therapy for EGFR mutation-positive NSCLCs because of promising clinical eficacy and good tolerability.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Thoracic Oncology Research Group.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
K. Kubota: Honoraria (self): Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, MSD, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, kyowa-hakko Kirin, AstraZeneca, Ono Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. K. Naoki: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant/Funding (institution): Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; Spouse/Financial dependant: Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. A. Bessho: Honoraria (self): Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. K. Minato: Research grant/Funding (institution): Taiho Pharmaceutical, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb. N. Seki: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Nipppon Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly Japan, Daiichi Sankyo, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Chugai Pharmaceutical; Research grant/Funding (self): Nihon Medi-Physics, Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim; Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca. T. Tokito: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca, Chugai Pharmaceutical, MSD. N. Furuya: Honoraria (self): Eli Lilly Japan, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Taiho Pharmaceutical, NipponBoehringer Ingelheim. H. Hayashi: Research grant/Funding (institution): Nippn Boehringer Ingelheim. H. Iihara: Research grant/Funding (institution): 19 飯原 大稔 附随研究 \"岐阜薬科大学 岐阜大学医学部附属病院” Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim. H. Okamoto: Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda, MSD, Ono Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Merck, Chugai Pharmaceutical, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly Japan, Daiich Sankyo. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
210P - Prognostic value of sarcopenia in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients: A systematic review
Presenter: Angeline Tancherla
Session: e-Poster Display Session
211P - The impact of low muscle mass to overall survival in bladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Karunia Japar
Session: e-Poster Display Session
212P - Stage I non-seminoma testicular cancer: Adjuvant management and outcomes
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
213P - Stage I seminoma testicular cancer: Predictors of relapse and outcomes for adjuvant carboplatin vs active surveillance
Presenter: Gaik Tin Quah
Session: e-Poster Display Session
214P - Study of treatment outcome in adults with TFE related RCC
Presenter: Ajaykumar Singh
Session: e-Poster Display Session
215P - Analysis of spatial heterogeneity of responses in metastatic sites with nivolumab in renal cell carcinoma
Presenter: Venkata Pradeep Babu Koyyala
Session: e-Poster Display Session
216P - Clinical profile and treatment outcome of testicular seminoma treated at tertiary care centre in Chennai
Presenter: Sivasubramaniam Kumaravelu
Session: e-Poster Display Session
220P - A cost-effectiveness analysis of systemic therapy for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer
Presenter: Winnie Sung
Session: e-Poster Display Session
221P - Patient-reported sexual and urinary function in nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) when treated with apalutamide (APA) vs placebo (PBO) and ongoing androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in SPARTAN
Presenter: Hiroji Uemura
Session: e-Poster Display Session
222P - Tolerability and treatment response to darolutamide (DARO) in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) in the phase III ARAMIS trial
Presenter: Matthew R. Smith
Session: e-Poster Display Session