Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

158P - Updated efficacy and safety of SOX regimen combined with inetetamab as first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ying Kong

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

Y. Kong1, Q. Dong1, P. Jin1, M. Li1, L. Ma1, Q. Yi1, Y. Miao1, J. Liu2, H. Liu1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 271000 - Taian/CN
  • 2 Department Of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University, 271000 - Taian/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 158P

Background

HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer patients have a poor prognosis. Current first-line treatment is Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy. Inetetamab, a new anti-HER2 drug, has not been evaluated for its efficacy and safety in gastric cancer. This study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of the SOX regimen combined with Inetetamab as a first-line treatment for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Eligible patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma were randomized into two treatment arms: one arm received inetetamab in combination with the SOX regimen, while the other arm received trastuzumab combined with the SOX regimen. Following completion of 4 to 6 cycles of treatment, patients exhibiting stable disease were administered maintenance therapy. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), while secondary endpoints encompassed the assessment of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and the occurrence of adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 38 patients enrolled, with 37 completing (18 inetetamab, 19 trastuzumab). Median PFS was significantly longer with inetetamab (8.5 months) vs trastuzumab (7.3 months, P=0.046). Median OS (15.3 vs 14.3 months), ORR (50% vs 42%), and DCR (88.9% vs 94.7%) showed no significant differences. Common AEs included hematological toxicities and gastrointestinal symptoms. Grade ≥ 3 AEs occurred in 56% of inetetamab patients and 47% of trastuzumab patients (P=0.63).

Conclusions

In the first-line therapeutic setting for patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer, inetetamab demonstrated comparable efficacy to trastuzumab, with a notable advantage in median progression-free survival (PFS) favoring the inetetamab group. Both treatment arms exhibited favorable safety profiles.

Clinical trial identification

ChiCTR2100051574.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.