Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

205P - Transarterial chemoembolization with immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-VEGF antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors as first-line treatment for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (CHANCE2202): A target trial emulation study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jian-Jian Chen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

J. Chen1, Z. Jin1, B. Zhong2, H. Zhu1, G. Teng1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Center Of Interventional Radiology & Vascular Surgery, Department Of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital Affiliated to Southeast University, 210009 - Nanjing/CN
  • 2 Department Of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, 215000 - Suzhou/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 205P

Background

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a first-line therapy for patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), although its survival benefits are modest. The CHANCE2202 study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes of combining TACE with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TACE-ICI-VEGF) compared to TACE alone as a first-line treatment for intermediate-stage HCC.

Methods

CHANCE2202 was a nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study including patients with intermediate-stage HCC who received either TACE-ICI-VEGF or TACE monotherapy between January 2018 and December 2022 in China. The study design followed the target trial emulation framework, employing stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) to minimize biases. The co-primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) per mRECIST.

Results

A total of 941 patients were included in the analysis, with 308 (32.7%) receiving TACE-ICI-VEGF treatment and 633 (67.3%) receiving TACE monotherapy. The median follow-up was 25.5 months and 25.8 months, respectively. After applying sIPTW, the baseline characteristics between the two groups were well-balanced. The median OS was 32.8 months (95% CI 31.1–40.6) with TACE-ICI-VEGF and 23.3 months (95% CI 21.7–26.1) with TACE (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.56, 95% CI 0.44-0.71; p<0.001). The median PFS was 18.7 months (95% CI 16.2–23.4) and 12.9 months (95% CI 11.8–14.3) in the respective treatment groups (aHR 0.66, 95% CI 0.55–0.79; p<0.0001) per mRECIST. Patients in the TACE-ICI-VEGF group had a higher objective response rate (ORR) per mRECIST (60.7% vs 44.9%, p< 0.0001). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 64 patients (20.8%) in the TACE-ICI-VEGF group and 43 patients (6.8%) in the TACE group.

Conclusions

Combining TACE to ICIs and anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs significantly improves clinical outcomes than TACE alone and represents a promising first-line treatment option for patients with intermediate-stage HCC.

Clinical trial identification

NCT05332496.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

The study was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (82130060, 61821002), National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFA0704100, 2018YFA0704104), Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Center (CXZX202219), Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Nanjing Life Health Science and Technology Project (202205045).

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.