Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

595P - Thoracoscopic intercostal nerve block with cocktail analgesics for pain control after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: A prospective, randomized, controlled, observer-blinded study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Yingxian Dong

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1616-S1622. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1696

Authors

Y. Dong1, J. Li2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Lung Cancer Center; Department Of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 - chengdu/CN
  • 2 Lung Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 - chengdu/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 595P

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether using intercostal nerve block with a cocktail of analgesics, wherein ropivacaine is mixed with dexmedetomidine, dexamethasone, methylprednisolone, magnesium sulfate, and sodium bicarbonate, during thoracoscopic surgery results in better clinical outcomes than using ropivacaine alone.

Methods

Data from patients undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) were consecutively collected between January 2023 and September 2023. The groups were randomized into two subgroups, which were cocktail intercostal nerve block group (CINB group) and ropivacaine intercostal nerve block group (RINB group). We assessed the patients' pain at different time points after surgery and discharge using the visual analog scale (VAS) and opioid consumption (morphine milligram equivalent, MME).

Results

After screening, 105 patients were randomized into two groups. The VAS scores were significantly lower in the CINB group than in the RINB group at 12 (3.00±0.99 vs. 3.66±0.85, p=0.001), 24 (2.60±0.85 vs. 3.66±0.85, p<0.001), and 48 2.26±0.75 vs. 4.02±0.84, p<0.001) hours. As for VAS after discharge, The VAS scores were all significantly lower in CINB group compared with RINB group 7 days (0.44±0.54 vs. 2.12±0.56, p<0.001), 14 days (0.14±0.35 vs. 1.37±0.60, p<0.001), and 30 days (0.08±0.27 vs. 0.78±0.42, p<0.001) after discharge. Postoperative opioid use was significantly lower in patients who underwent CINB (median = 0 MME, IQR 0–30 MME) compared to the RINB group (median = 30 MME, IQR 0–90 MME; p<0.001).

Conclusions

Based on this single-center analysis, CINB provided better analgesia after surgery and discharge, and reduced opioid consumption.

Clinical trial identification

The study was approved by the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100046774). In accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, the Ethics Committee on Biomedical Research, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, and the Chinese Ethics Committee of Registering Clinical Trials approved our clinical research protocol (#357) in April 2021. Patients were informed of the risks associated with narcotic drug use and signed a formal informed consent form and provided informed written consent for the publication of their study data.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Y. Dong.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.