Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Mini Oral session: Gynaecological cancers

376MO - The impact of crossover to surgery in the no-surgery group on the survival: A post-hoc analysis of the SOC-1 trial

Date

08 Dec 2024

Session

Mini Oral session: Gynaecological cancers

Topics

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Lina Shen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1544-S1553. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1691

Authors

L. Shen1, S. Jiang2, R. Jiang2, Y. Chen2, L. Xiang2, R. Zang1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 200032 - Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Department Of Gynecologic Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital Affiliated to Fudan University, 200031 - Shanghai/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 376MO

Background

In the SOC-1 trial (NCT01611766), secondary cytoreduction significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC). The predefined threshold for statistical significance was not met for overall survival (OS), which might be due to a high rate of patients in the no-surgery group (control group) crossing over to surgery following subsequent relapse. The impact of crossover on survival remains to be explored.

Methods

We conducted a post-hoc analysis of SOC-1 data to determine the impact of crossover to surgery following first subsequent relapse (during the third-line treatment) in the control group. The PFS and OS were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

Of the 175 patients assigned to the control group in the SOC-1 trial, 149 (85%) patients had first subsequent relapse. Among the 149 patients, 55 (37%) patients had crossover and underwent cytoreductive surgery during the third-line treatment. The remaining 94 (63%) patients received systemic therapy only during the third-line treatment. Median PFS was 15.8 months for the patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and 10.2 months for those without surgery after first subsequent relapse (hazard ratio [HR] 0.48, 95% CI 0.33–0.70, P < 0.001). Median OS was 60.1 months for patients treated with cytoreductive surgery and 27.5 months for the patients without surgery (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.30–0.71, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

In this analysis, a significantly improved PFS and OS were observed for patients who crossed over to surgery after the first subsequent relapse in the control group. For PSROC patients, surgical approach may still present a beneficial treatment option in the later-line treatment.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01611766.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Zhongshan Talent Fund (no. 016, to R.Z.), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81972429 and 82273388, to R.Z.) and Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project (no. 22Y21900300, to R.Z.) for funding this trial.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.