Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

593TiP - The efficacy and safety of mirtazapine vs olanzapine in preventing chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in combination with the triplet regimen in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: An open label, prospective, randomized control study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

ANUSHA MRUTHYUNJAYA SWAMY

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1595-S1615. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1695

Authors

A. MRUTHYUNJAYA SWAMY1, A. Sehrawat1, D. Sundriyal2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Science Rishikesh, 249203 - Rishikesh/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology And Hematology Department, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Science Rishikesh, 249203 - Rishikesh/IN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 593TiP

Background

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are common and disturbing side effects and without proper therapy, the risk rises to 90 % of patients with highly-emetogenic-chemotherapy (HEC). The ASCO and NCCN guidelines recommend olanzapine as a first-choice option in combination with standard triplet regimen for patients receiving HEC as a new quadruple standard antiemetic regimen. Despite the quadruple drug prophylaxis, delayed nausea- vomiting, significantly impacts the patient’s outcomes and the AEs of olanzapine are troublesome. Hence, the need for a better alternative. Mirtazapine, in addition to its antiemetic effects, accelerates gastric emptying, stimulates appetite, improves sleep quality and has anxiolytic properties. Studies comparing Mirtazapine and Olanzapine in terms of efficacy and tolerability in CINV of HEC are few. Hence, the present study will be conducted to compare the antiemetic prophylaxis and safety of Mirtazapine versus olanzapine (both in combination with triplet regimen) receiving first dose of highly emetogenic chemotherapy regimens during acute phase (0-24 hours), delayed phase (24-120 hours) and overall period (0-120 hours).

Trial design

Prospective, open label, randomized controlled trial to enrol 120 chemotherapy naive patients (60 in each group) requiring HEC. Baseline data will be collected. Block randomization technique and opaque numbered envelopes will be used for allocation. Patients to keep a diary record of emetic episodes, nausea, use of rescue medications, occurrence of Adverse Events (AE) and to fill the FLIE questionnaire on Day 2 and Day 6 and responses will be collected on D6. Proportion of patients with nausea, vomiting and need of rescue medication during acute, delayed and overall period in both the study groups will be analyzed. Table: 593TiP

Treatment arms

ARM Drug Days
ARM A (FDP-M)INJ FOSAPREPITANT 150mg IVDay1
INJ DEXAMETHASONE 8-12mg IV followed byDay1
TAB DEXAMETHASONE 4mg BDDay 1-4
INJ PALONOSETRON 0.25mg IVDay 1
TAB MIRTAZAPINE 15mg ODDay 1-4
ARM B (FDP-O)INJ FOSAPREPITANT 150mg IVDay1
INJ DEXAMETHASONE 8-12mg IV followed byDay1
TAB DEXAMETHASONE 4mg BDDay 1-4
INJ PALONOSETRON 0.25mg IVDay 1
TAB OLANZAPINE 5mg ODDay 1-4
.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.