Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

105P - TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) plus bevacizumab versus TAS-102 alone as salvage treatment options for metastatic colorectal cancer in routine clinical practice

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ji Eun Shin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1432-S1449. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1687

Authors

J.E. Shin1, S. Cho2, J. Lee3, S.T. Kim4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Medical Oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, College of Medicine, Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea, 442-723 - Suwon/KR
  • 2 Hemato-oncology, Dankook University Medical Center, Seoul/KR
  • 3 Division Of Medical Oncology-hematology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Seoul/KR
  • 4 Division Of Hematology-oncology, Department Of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center (SMC), 135-710 - Seoul/KR

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 105P

Background

Both regimens of TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) with and without bevacizumab are considered standard options for salvage treatment in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

Methods

This analysis included patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who received either TAS-102 plus bevacizumab or TAS-102 alone between July 2022 and November 2023 at Samsung Medical Center. We evaluated the objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile of both regimens.

Results

Of 139 patients, 83 (59.7%) received TAS-102 with bevacizumab, and 56 (40.3%) received TAS-102 alone. The median number of previous lines of therapy was four (range: 2.45–6.55). More than half the subjects (56.8%) had RAS mutations and 92.9% had received previous anti-VEGF therapy. The number of patients with prior regorafenib treatment was 14 in the TAS-102 with bevacizumab group and five in the TAS-102 alone group. The disease control rate was 51.8% in the combination group and 32.1% in the TAS-102 alone group. The median PFS was 3.3 months (95% CI, 2.7–6.6) in the combination group and 2.5 months (95% CI, 2.0–3.8) in the TAS-102 alone group (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38–0.82; p=0.003). The median OS in these two groups was 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.4–NA) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 4.8–9.8), respectively (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40–0.97, p=0.033). In the groups, commonly observed adverse events were hematologic-related, including neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia, as well as nausea. While any grade neutropenia was observed at similar frequencies in the two groups (57.8% and 57.1%), grade 3 or higher neutropenia was more frequent in the combination group than the TAS-102 alone group (31.3% vs. 17.9%). Among patients who received subsequent anticancer therapy after treatment failure, 74.1% received regorafenib.

Conclusions

The combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab resulted in a better survival outcome than TAS-102 monotherapy, consistent with previous studies. This analysis supports the use of the combination of TAS-102 and bevacizumab as the best therapeutic option for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer in clinical practice.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.