Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

637P - Taletrectinib vs repotrectinib in ROS1-positive (ROS1+) non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC)

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Misako Nagasaka

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1632-S1678. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1698

Authors

M. Nagasaka1, G. Liu2, N. Pennell3, Y. Ohe4, M. Pérol5, S. Li6, M. Chen7, L. Bazhenova8, C. Zhou9

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medicine, University of California Irvine School of Medicine and Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 92868 - Orange/US
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Temerty School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto/CA
  • 3 Hematology And Medical Oncology, Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland/US
  • 4 Department Of Thoracic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo/JP
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, Léon Bérard Cancer Center, Lyon/FR
  • 6 Clinical Development And Medical Affairs, Nuvation Bio, New York/US
  • 7 Biostatistics Department, Nuvation Bio, New York/US
  • 8 Medicine Department, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, San Diego/US
  • 9 Department Of Medical Oncology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital and Thoracic Cancer Institute, Tongji University School of Medicine, Shanghai/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 637P

Background

The next-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) taletrectinib and repotrectinib have demonstrated promising outcomes in clinical trials of patients with advanced/metastatic ROS1+ NSCLC. In the absence of head-to-head trials, we compared taletrectinib and repotrectinib in patients with ROS1+ NSCLC using a MAIC.

Methods

Patients receiving taletrectinib in TRUST I (NCT04395677) and TRUST-II (NCT04919811); data cut-off: March 2024; were pooled and matched to patients receiving repotrectinib in TRIDENT 1 (NCT03093116) on age, gender, ECOG status, disease stage, smoking history, histological classification, baseline CNS disease, and number of previous systemic therapies. Patients were stratified by prior TKI status (naive/pretreated); objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared. Adjusted Cox regression models computed hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results

After matching, covariates were balanced across the taletrectinib and repotrectinib TKI-naive and TKI-pretreated cohorts. In TKI-naive patients, the ORR for taletrectinib (n=152; 89%) was numerically higher vs repotrectinib (n=71; 79%). In TKI-pretreated patients, the ORR was numerically higher for taletrectinib (n=104; 56%) vs repotrectinib (n=56; 38%) with largely non-overlapping CIs. For both TKI-naive and pretreated patients, the lower bound of the 95% CI for the ORR of taletrectinib exceeded the ORR of repotrectinib (Table). The HRs for DOR and PFS numerically favored taletrectinib but were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Taletrectinib may induce more frequent tumor responses than repotrectinib in both TKI-naive and TKI-pretreated ROS1+ NSCLC patients. Further analyses with more mature DOR and PFS data are needed to confirm our findings Table: 637P

MAIC: Outcomes comparison in TKI-naive and TKI-pretreated cohorts

Outcomes TKI naive TKI pretreated
Taletrectinib after matching (N=152) Repotrectinib (N=71) Taletrectinib after matching (N=104) Repotrectinib (N=56)
ORR, % 95% CI 88.8% 82.7%–93.3% 78.9% 67.6%–87.7% 55.8% 45.7%–65.5% 37.5% 24.9%–51.5%
DOR, hazard ratio 95% CI 0.76 0.404–1.438 0.86 0.419–1.776
PFS, hazard ratio 95% CI 0.93 0.656–1.311 0.97 0.578–1.612

DOR, duration of response; MAIC, matching adjusted indirect comparison; ORR, objective response rate; PFS, progression-free survival; TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitor.

.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04395677, NCT04919811.

Editorial acknowledgement

Writing support was provided by Lorena Tonarelli, MSc, of Peloton Advantage, LLC, an OPEN Health company.

Legal entity responsible for the study

AnHeart Therapeutics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nuvation Bio Inc.

Funding

AnHeart Therapeutics, a wholly owned subsidiary of Nuvation Bio Inc.

Disclosure

M. Nagasaka: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Caris Life Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Novartis, EMD Serono, Janssen, Lilly, Pfizer, Genentech, Mirati, Regeneron, Silverback; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Takeda, Blueprint; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel: AnHeart. G. Liu: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honorarium: Takeda, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Roche, Novartis, Merck, Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding, Research Grants: Takeda, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim. N. Pennell: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Merck, BMS, Pfizer, Genentech, Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis, Bayer, Summit Therapeutics, AnHeart, Takeda, J&J, Lilly/Regeneron, Iovance. Y. Ohe: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Chugai, ONO, BMS, Celltrion, Amgen, Nippon Kayaku, Boehringer Ingelheim, AnHeart Therapeutics Inc., PharmaMar; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca, Chugai, Eli Lilly, ONO, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Pfizer, MSD, Taiho, Nippon Kayaku, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, Eisai, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Research Expenses: AstraZeneca, Chugai, Lilly, ONO, BMS, Pfizer, Taiho, Novartis, Takeda, Daiichi Sankyo, Janssen. M. Pérol: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Advisory board: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Lilly, Novartis, Takeda, Gritstone, Sanofi, Pfizer, Amgen, Janssen, GSK, Esai, Ipsen, Novocure, AbbVie, Anheart Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, Symposium: Roche, AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Takeda, Illumina, Pfizer, Medscape; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Expert Testimony: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member, Steering Committee member: LILLY; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, Local PI: AbbVie, Amgen, Anheart Therapeutics, Apollomics, Arrivent Biopharma, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Daiichi Sankyo, Innate Pharma, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Resarch grant: AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Takeda; Financial Interests, Personal, Trial Chair, Trial Chair: Anheart Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member, IDMC Chair: Pharmamar, Sophiagenetics; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member, Steering Committee Member: ROCHE; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, DMSB: ROCHE. S. Li: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Nuvation Bio, Inc. M. Chen: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Nuvation Bio. L. Bazhenova: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Nuvation Bio, Inc, Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo, Genentech, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Janssen/J&J, Novocure, ORIC, Regeneron, Pfizer, Sanofi, Teligene, Boehringer Ingelheim. C. Zhou: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria: Amoy Diagnostics, Boehringer Ingelheim, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Hengrui Pharmaceutical, Innovent Biologics, Lilly China, LUYE Pharma, MSD, QiLu Pharmaceutical, Roche, Sanofi, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc.; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Amoy Diagnostics, Boehringer Ingelheim, CStone Pharmaceuticals, Hengrui Pharmaceutical, Innovent Biologics, Lilly China, Luye Pharma, MSD, QiLu Pharmaceutical, Roche, Sanofi, TopAlliance Biosciences Inc.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.