Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

508P - Survival outcomes of patients with tropomyosin receptor kinase fusion-positive cancer receiving larotrectinib versus standard of care: a matching-adjusted indirect comparison using real-world data

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Carsten Bokemeyer

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1580-S1594. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1694

Authors

C. Bokemeyer1, K. Abrams2, J. Garcia-Foncillas3, A. Italiano4, U.N. Lassen5, L. Linsell2, M. Marian6, N. Paracha7, S. Sullivan8, J. Thompson2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology And Hematology Dept., University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20246 - Hamburg/DE
  • 2 Statistics, Visible Analytics Limited, OX28 4BE - Witney/GB
  • 3 Autonomous University, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid/ES
  • 4 Early Phase Trials Unit, Institute Bergonié - Centre Régional de Lutte Contre le Cancer (CLCC), 33000 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 5 Oncology Department, Phase 1 Unit, Rigshospitalet, 2100 - Copenhagen/DK
  • 6 Pharmaceutical & Oncology Dept., Bayer Consumer Care AG, 4052 - Basel/CH
  • 7 Market Access, Bayer (Schweiz) AG, 8045 - Zurich/CH
  • 8 School Of Pharmacy, The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, 98195 - s/US

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 508P

Background

Larotrectinib is a highly specific tropomyosin receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitor that has demonstrated high response rates in single-arm trials of patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer. There are limited data on their relative efficacy compared to standard-of-care (SoC) regimens used in routine clinical practice before the widespread adoption of TRK inhibitors as SoC for TRK fusion-positive cancers. Matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC), a validated methodology that balances population characteristics to facilitate cross-trial comparisons, was used to compare the overall survival (OS) of larotrectinib versus non-TRK-inhibitor SoC.

Methods

Individual adult patient data from three larotrectinib trials (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02122913, NCT02637687, and NCT02576431), July 2023 cut off, were compared with published aggregate real-world data from patients aged ≥18 years with locally advanced/metastatic TRK fusion-positive cancer identified in the Hartwig Medical Foundation database. OS was defined as the time from start of first post-biopsy treatment (or larotrectinib) to death. The two patient populations were matched on clinical characteristics that were available in the real-world data and the treatment effect of larotrectinib versus non–TRK-inhibitor SoC was estimated.

Results

Twenty-four non-TRK-inhibitor SoC and 120 larotrectinib patients were included in the analyses. After matching, median OS was 50.3 months (IQR: 23.3, not estimable) for larotrectinib compared with 13 months (IQR: 6.4, 18.3) for SoC, and larotrectinib was associated with an 84% risk reduction of death (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.16, 95%CI: 0.07 to 0.36). Restricted mean survival conducted up to 26.2 months (the largest observed event time in the SoC arm) was 22.6 for larotrectinib and 12.8 months for SoC (mean difference: 9.8 months, 95% CI: 5.6 to 14.0).

Conclusions

This analysis suggests longer OS with larotrectinib, compared with non–TRK-inhibitor SoC, in adult patients with TRK fusion-positive cancer. These findings support a previous MAIC conducted using real-world data in this population.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Bayer Pharmaceuticals.

Funding

Bayer Pharmaceuticals.

Disclosure

C. Bokemeyer: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, advisory boards and speaker: Merck Serono; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche Pharma, AOK Germany, Med update; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer Healthcare, Oncology Drug Consult CRO, Lindis Biotech, BioNTech; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, Boards attended and lectures given: Sanofi Aventis; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board, advisory board and speaker: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker, orgaistion for medical education: med update; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, our department is involved in several clincal trials sponsored by industry and cooperative groups where we hold praticipants roles and local PI roles and PI roles: more than 95 clinical trials; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: DGHO; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Hamburg Cancer Society, National Network of German Cancer Centers (DKH); Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member of Board of Directors: Northern German Society of Internal Medicine; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Board of DGHO Advisors: DGHO; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Board of Directors Oncology Center Certification Committee: German Cancer Society. K. Abrams: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. J. Garcia-Foncillas: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Bayer Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bayer pharmaceuticals. A. Italiano: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bayer Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. U.N. Lassen: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Bayer, Novartis; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche, BMS, Pfizer, GSK, Lilly, Incyte, Janssen. L. Linsell: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. M. Marian: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Bayer. N. Paracha: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Bayer Pharmaceuticals. S. Sullivan: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Bayer Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Bayer pharmaceuticals. J. Thompson: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Bayer Pharmaceuticals.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.