Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

221P - Survival analysis of TACE monotherapy vs. combination therapy in BCLC B and C stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Chengxiang Guo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

C. Guo1, X. Bai2, T. Liang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 310003 - Hangzhou/CN
  • 2 Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Zhejiang University, 310003 - Hangzhou/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 221P

Background

Standard treatments provide limited benefits for patients with intermediate or advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective observational study aimed to assess potential improvements associated with systemic therapies in patients receiving transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for initially unresectable HCC.

Methods

Between February 2019 to March 2023, we reviewed patients diagnosed with intermediate- to-advanced HCC, treated with either TACE or TACE combined with antiangiogenic and immunotherapy (combination group) as their initial treatment. To balance the impact of confounding biases, we further divided the entire study population into surgical and non-surgical cohorts and conducted separate assessments. The analysis focused on comparing the progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety profile of the combination group with those of TACE monotherapy.

Results

Out of 279 patients with initially unresectable intermediate or advanced HCC, 156 successfully underwent subsequent curative intent liver resection after preoperative treatments (TACE group, n= 69, combination group, n= 87), while 123 patients continued non-surgical treatments (TACE group, n= 31, combination group, n= 92). After PSM, 26 matched patient pairs were generated in non-surgical cohort. The combination group exhibited a significantly extended PFS for non-surgical patients (9.4 vs. 7.2 months, p= 0.043). Cox analysis also suggested that this combination therapy regimen was associated with improved PFS in non-surgical cohort (HR= 0.476, 95% CI: 0.257-0.883, p= 0.019). In surgical patients exceeding up-to-seven criteria, the combination group demonstrated superior median PFS (18.0 vs. 14.6 months, p= 0.03) and OS (Not reached vs. 50.1 months, p= 0.049) compared to the TACE group. Adverse events were manageable and did not result in any treatment-related fatalities.

Conclusions

TACE in combination with systemic antitumor therapy demonstrated improved survival benefits in patients with intermediate to advanced HCC, particularly among surgical patients with higher tumor burden.

Clinical trial identification

NCT06261138.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.