Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

309P - Risk stratification of advanced urothelial carcinoma in the era of cancer immunotherapy

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Go Kaneko

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1505-S1530. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1689

Authors

G. Kaneko, D. Igarashi, M. Hagiwara, S. Shirotake, M. Oyama

Author affiliations

  • Urooncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, 350-1298 - Saitama/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 309P

Background

In Japan, pembrolizumab became available for platinum-resistant urothelial carcinoma in 2017, followed by avelumab maintenance therapy. With potent first-line therapies, case-by-case treatment selection is anticipated. This study aims to assess risk stratification of advanced urothelial carcinoma in the era of cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

137 patients (58 with bladder cancer) who initiated first-line chemotherapy between December 2017 and December 2023 were enrolled. Cox proportional hazards models were used to investigate predictors of overall survival (OS). Risk was stratified into three groups based on the number of factors.

Results

The median age was 74 years, with males accounting for 95 cases. Of the 131 patients who discontinued first-line therapy, 100 (76.3%) switched to an immuno-oncology (IO) drug: avelumab in 23 and pembrolizumab in 77 patients. Of the 81 patients who discontinued IO drugs, 40 (49.4%) switched to subsequent therapy. Predictors of OS included ECOG-PS ≥ 2, histological variant, CRP level, and liver metastases. The median OS in the favorable (Factor 0, 53 patients), intermediate (Factor 1, 46 patients), and poor (Factor ≥2, 38 patients) risk groups were 43.9, 16.4, and 8.3 months, respectively. Twenty-six patients (68.4%) in the poor risk had PS ≥ 2 at treatment start, with a conversion rate to IO drugs of 63.2%, lower than in the other groups. Disease control after four courses of first-line therapy was achieved in 26 (49.1%) and 27 (32.1%) patients in the favorable and intermediate + poor risk, respectively. The median progression-free survival in 14 patients in the favorable risk who switched to avelumab maintenance was 9.3 months, significantly longer than 3.7 months in the intermediate + poor risk (9 patients). The median OS after switching to avelumab maintenance was 18.1 months in the intermediate + poor risk, but not reached in the favorable risk.

Conclusions

The OS of the cohort in the era of cancer immunotherapy until 2023 has not improved compared to previous years. The prognosis in the poor risk remains unfavorable. While novel therapies may offer promise, many patients have decreased PS, and therapy choice should be carefully considered. Some favorable risk cases show a good prognosis even with conventional therapy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.