Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

360P - Real-world treatment and clinical outcomes in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): REMPRO-Middle East and Africa (MEA)

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Gamal El Husseiny

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1531-S1543. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1690

Authors

G. El Husseiny1, A. Nowier2, B. Basulaiman3, R. Ghali4, H. Farag5, A. Aboutaleb5, V. Rajadhyaksha6, S.H. Tirmazy7, B. Sahin8

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Oncology, Alexandria University, 21321 - Alexandria/EG
  • 2 Department Of Urology, Ain Shams University, 11517 - Cairo/EG
  • 3 Department Of Medical Oncology, KFMC - King Fahad Medical City, 11525 - Riyadh/SA
  • 4 Department Of Oncology, Ain Shams University, 11331 - Cairo/EG
  • 5 Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca Pharma Egypt, 11371 - New Cairo/EG
  • 6 Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, England/GB
  • 7 Department Of Oncology, Dubai Hospital, Dubai/AE
  • 8 Department Of Urology, Marmara University, 34854 - Istanbul/TR

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 360P

Background

With evolving treatment (Tx) options for mCRPC, it is important to understand the real-world Tx trends and associated effectiveness. REMPRO (NCT04801186) study determined the Tx patterns and survival outcomes in patients (pts) with mCRPC in Asia, MEA, and Latin America.

Methods

This retrospective study enrolled males, >18 years (y) diagnosed with mCRPC between Jan 2016 and Dec 2018 who progressed on androgen deprivation therapy alone and received ≥1 line of Tx (LOT, as mono- or combination) with ≥12 months (m) of follow-up data available. Primary objective was Tx patterns and secondary objectives were clinicodemographics and survival analyzed by Kaplan–Meier method. We present data from the MEA cohort.

Results

MEA included 212 pts (median age: 67 [range: 42–95] y) with 66.0% ≥65 y. At initial diagnosis, all had adenocarcinoma, 70.2% (125/178) had a Gleason score ≥8, 87.3% (185/212) were castration-sensitive, 81.6% (142/174) had de novo metastasis and 67.4% (128/190) had a bone-only metastasis. Post-mCRPC diagnosis, 95.8% (203/212) received LOT1, 43.8% (89/203) received LOT2, and 31.5% (28/89) received LOT3. Chemotherapy (CT)- and new hormonal agent (NHA)-based Tx were the most prescribed in 1L and 2L: CT-based (LOT1: 44.4%, 72/162; LOT2: 28.9%, 24/83) and NHA-based (LOT1: 27.8%, 45/162; LOT2: 53.0%, 44/83), respectively. For NHA users, the median duration of Tx (DoT) was 6.3, 8.9, and 6.0 m for 1L, 2L, and 3L with corresponding median real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) of 24.6, 10.1, and 15.9 m, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was highest in NHA users at 1L (34.2 m) decreasing to 26.4 m at 3L. Disease progression led to Tx discontinuation in >44% pts. Table: 360P

Tx and survival (m)

Tx N DoT # N Events *rwPFS Events *OS
LOT1, 203 All 155 96 12.1, 8.6-15.8 59 34.2, 23.5-NA
BCT 36 4.7 (0.8, 34.7) 33 30 5.1, 3.0-7.0 16 22.4, 7.6-NA
NHA 45 6.3 (1.4, 31.3) 36 17 24.6, 10.5-31.4 12 34.2, 24.6-NA
CT 72 3.7 (0, 21.3) 56 24 18.1, 8.6-NA 17 NA
LOT2, 89 All 73 52 8.7, 7.0-12.2 30 32.0, 12.5-NA
BCT 1 1.8 (1.8, 1.8) 1 1 1.9, NA 1 1.9, NA
NHA 44 8.9 (0.6, 51.3) 35 27 10.1, 7.9-12.9 14 37.2, 12.7-NA
CT 24 4.1 (0, 15.5) 22 14 8.3, 4.1-15.8 8 NA
LOT3, 28 All 23 16 8.6, 5.0-18.4 8 26.4, 16.5-NA
NHA 9 6.0 (1.6, 24.3) 8 5 15.9, 1.2-NA 3 26.4, 6.6-NA
CT 14 5.1 (1.2, 8.6) 13 10 8.4, 4.0-10.0 4 31.6, 10.0-NA

BCT, bicalutamide; NA, not available; *median, 95% CI Egypt, 100; Saudi Arabia, 35; Türkiye, 53; UAE, 24 # median (range)

Conclusions

Our results highlight NHA- and CT-based Tx as the most common pattern for mCRPC at both LOT1 and 2. Less than 45% received LOT2. There was a progressive decline in OS with increasing LOT, indicating an unmet need for better Tx sequencing with novel agents in MEA.

Clinical trial identification

NCT04801186.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Funding

This study was supported by AstraZeneca and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA.

Disclosure

H. Farag, A. Aboutaleb, V. Rajadhyaksha: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.