Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

521P - Real-world performance of a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay for solid tumor patients in Asia and the Middle East (AME)

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Chun-Ming Tsai

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1580-S1594. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1694

Authors

N. Rohatgi1, C. Tsai2, A. Bahl3, A. Rauthan4, A. Agarwal5, S. Dawood6, M. Alakasheh7, A. Kaur8, N. Sandhir9, S. Olsen9

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Fortis Flt. Lt. Rajan Dhall Hospital, Vasant Kunj, 110070 - New Delhi/IN
  • 2 Oncology Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, 11217 - Taipei City/TW
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Max Super Speciality Hospital, Saket, 110017 - New Delhi/IN
  • 4 Medical Oncology Dept, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 5 Medical Oncology Dept., Fortis Hospital, 560072 - Bangalore/IN
  • 6 Oncology Department, Mediclinic City Hospital, Dubai/AE
  • 7 Oncology, Dar Alshifa, AMMAN/JO
  • 8 Genomic Counseling And Client Services, Guardant Health Pte. Ltd., 138543 - Singapore/SG
  • 9 Medical And Clinical Affairs Department, Guardant Health Pte. Ltd., 138543 - Singapore/SG

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 521P

Background

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of tumor tissue (Tx) identifies precision oncology targets but typically requires tumor content (TC) of at least 20% and has a one-month turnaround time (TAT). We retrospectively evaluated the results of a new Tx-based CGP assay designed to overcome these hurdles.

Methods

NGS analyzed Tx samples from advanced cancer patients (pts) in AME at a central laboratory in United States (US). Using DNA-based hybrid capture technology, Guardant360 TissueNext™ v1.0 reports point mutations (mts), insertions (ins)/deletions, amplification (amp, and fusions (fus) in up to 84 genes, plus tumor mutation burden (TMB) and microsatellite instability (MSI) status. Frequencies of alterations (alts) detected in this cohort were compared to other publicly available databases from US and China using cBioPortal.

Results

We processed 1160 samples from 954 pts (49% women, median age 61 years). Most patients had lung adenocarcinoma (LuAd, 41%), followed by colorectal cancer (11%) and breast cancer (9%). Assay success rate was 83.8%. Median TAT was 13 days (5-83 days). Most mutated genes were TP53 (64%), EGFR (24%), and KRAS (19%). Common amps were EGFR (16%), MYC (7%), and FGFR1 (6%), and fus included ALK (3%), FGFR (1%), and RET (1%). 1% of pts had MSI-high, and 12% had TMB-high (³10 mt/Mb). 17% pts had TC ≤10%. Detection rates for EGFR mts, MET amp, and ALK fus were 25%, 4%, and 3% for TC ≤10% versus 24%, 4%, and 3%, respectively, for TC >10%. Among the largest subset, LuAd pts, actionable alts included EGFR (56%), KRAS (14%; 5% G12C), and ERBB2 (5%) mt; BRAF V600E (1%); ALK (5%), RET (2%), NTRK1 (0.6%) and ROS1 (2%) fus; MET amp (5%) and exon 14 skipping (1%); MSI-H (1%) and TMB-high (13%). Uncommon EGFR mts were seen in 16% of pts. 35% of EGFR exon 20 ins were outside of known hotspots. Rare fus in EGFR, MET, BRAF, and FGFR genes were observed in 2.6% of samples combined. For LuAd samples, database comparison revealed consistent detection rates with China and US except for EGFR (lower in US) and KRAS (higher in US).

Conclusions

Our analysis revealed that this CGP assay can detect actionable and rare alterations with expected frequency with a median TAT of 13 days. Biomarker detection was feasible even when TC<20%.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Guardant Health AMEA, Singapore, 138567.

Funding

Guardant Health AMEA, Singapore, 138567.

Disclosure

N. Rohatgi, A. Bahl: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Guardant Health-AMEA. S. Dawood: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, AstraZeneca, Lilly, Merck, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Roche, MSD, BMS, Pfizer, Lilly, AstraZeneca, Caris; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: MSD, Amgen; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Member: ASCO, ESMO. A. Kaur, N. Sandhir, S. Olsen: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Guardant Health-AMEA. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.