Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

8P - Real-world outcomes of anthracycline-containing versus anthracycline-sparing chemotherapy in early HER2 breast cancer: Western Australia experience

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Hsing Hwa Lee

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1405-S1414. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1683

Authors

H.H. Lee1, B. Zhang2, H. Martin3, A.D. Redfern1, L.L. Lo4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Dept., Fiona Stanley Hospital, 6150 - Perth/AU
  • 2 Medical Oncology Dept., Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, 6009 - Nedlands/AU
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Fiona Stanley Hospital, 6150 - Perth/AU
  • 4 Medical Oncology Dept, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, 6009 - Nedlands/AU

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 8P

Background

Anthracycline-sparing (AS) regimens caused less cardiotoxicity and provided equivalent outcomes with anthracycline-containing (AC) regimens in early HER2 positive breast cancer (BC) prospective trials. We would like to confirm these findings in the real-world setting.

Methods

A retrospective review of HER2 positive early BC patients was conducted from Jan 2016 to May 2024 at two tertiary hospitals in Western Australia (WA). Eligible patients had received anti-HER2 targeted therapy with chemotherapy. Data analysed included pathological complete response (pCR), grade 3 or 4 (G3/4) toxicities including cardiotoxicity, hospitalisation rates, and disease-free survival (DFS) computed by Kaplan Meier analysis.

Results

179 patients were included with median ages of 54 (AC) vs 55 (AS) years. Median duration of follow up was 4.5 years. 38/119 (31.9%) patients received AC vs 81/119 (68.1%) AS regimens. Adjuvant AS patients had significantly more N0-1 cancers (97.5% vs 73.7%), P<0.0001. 60/179 (33.5%) patients had neoadjuvant therapy; n=24 (40%) had AC; 36 (60%) had AS regimens. AS group had numerically higher rates of pCR, 55.6% vs 45.8%. The AC group had more G3-4 toxicities (32.3% vs 19.7%); more cardiotoxicities (4.8% vs 2.6%); and hospital admissions (21% versus 12.8%) than the AS group. Patients with non-pCR had a significant drop (-2.9%) in mean ejection fraction (EF) between baseline and pre-operative timepoints, P=0.027 compared to no significant LVEF fall in those experiencing a pCR. 5-year DFS was not significantly different at 96.7% (AC) vs 95.6% (AS), P= 0.56. Table: 8P

Variable AC N (%) AS N (%)
All pts Neoadj Adjuvant All pts Neoadj Adjuvant P AC v AS
Total 62 24 38 117 36 81
Age (years)
median 55.5 53.5 48 58
range 24-78 24-78 32-75 21-85 21-82 27-85
Pathological complete response (pCR)
Complete pCR 11 (45.8) 20 (55.6)
Incomplete pCR 13 (54.2) 16 (44.4)
Pathological Nodal (N) stage
N0 31 16 (66.7) 15 (39.5) 89 27 (75) 62 (76.5) P=<0.0001
N1 18 5 (20.8) 13 (34.2) 24 7 (19.4) 17 (21)
N2 11 3 (12.5) 8 (21.1) 2 2 (5.6) 0 (0)
N3 2 0 (0) 2 (5.3) 2 0 (0) 2 (2.5)
Ejection Fraction (EF)
Baseline median % 66 70 66 67
Range 48-83 54-71 48-83 46-82 54-82 46-82
Final median after completion of anti-HER2 therapy % 60.5 63 63 63
Range 19-75 53-70 19-75 28-79 40-73 28-79

Conclusions

Current WA practice includes both AC and AS regimens. As expected, AC group had more toxicities and hospital admissions than AS group. Despite lower nodal risk BC the AS group had similar short term BC outcomes. Patients with non-pCR had significant EF reductions prior to surgery. More data is needed to confirm this finding and explore the underlying biology.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

H. H. Lee.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.