Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

399P - Real-world experience of immunotherapy in metastatic dMMR endometrial cancer at a tertiary cancer center

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

B.M Soumya

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1544-S1553. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1691

Authors

B.M.B. Soumya1, A. Rauthan2, P. Patil3, N.Y. Murthy3, H. N.j4, P. S N5, A. Umashankar5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Manipal hospitals, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology Dept, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 4 Medical Oncology Dept., Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN
  • 5 Medical Oncology, Manipal Comprehensive Cancer Center Manipal Hospital, 560017 - Bangalore/IN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 399P

Background

Endometrial cancers have the highest prevalence of MSI-H/MMR deficient variants. Our study evaluates the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in metastatic dMMR endometrial cancer.

Methods

Our study aims to analyze the response rate and survival outcome in patients with metastatic endometrial cancer receiving immunotherapy at a tertiary-center. This is a retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic dMMR endometrial cancer who received immunotherapy from Jan 2020-Jan 2024. Testing of MMR was done by IHC on tumor tissue.

Results

58 patients were identified, 44(75%) were MMR-proficient and 14(24%) MMR-deficient. Among the 14, 11 received treatment with immunotherapy. 9 were endometroid variant, 1-high grade endometrial sarcoma and 1 had poorly differentiated carcinoma. MLH1 and PMS2 loss seen in 6 patients and 5 had MSH2 and MSH6 loss. Immunotherapy agents used were pembrolizumab and nivolumab. 10 received chemotherapy+immunotherapy (8 as first line and 2 as second line), one received immunotherapy as single agent first line treatment. Objective response-rate was 81%. 4(36%) had complete response, 5(45%) partial response and 2(18%) had disease progression. At a median follow-up of 20 months, median progression free survival (mPFS) was 31 months and median overall survival (mOS) was not reached. PFS rates at 12 and 24months were 64% and 50% respectively. 24months OS rate was 78%. Adverse events mainly were hypothyroidism, fatigue and skin rash with no grade 3/4 adverse events.

Conclusions

Our patients with dMMR endometrial cancers showed remarkable efficacy and long-term outcomes. It is mandatory to check for MMR in endometrial cancer patients to identify these subgroups who do very well.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.