Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

437P - Real-world efficacy of induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy compared to concurrent chemoradiation therapy in patients with very advanced head and neck squamous cell cancer

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Olesya Stativko

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1554-S1574. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1692

Authors

O. Stativko1, I. Pokataev1, M. Nosova1, E. Sabitov2, E. Tsareva1, O. Kuchevskaya1, E. Kuzmina1, M.A. Lyadova1, T. Antonova1, M. Dolov3, A. Tedeeva3, S. Kravtsov4, S. Parts5, V.N. Galkin5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Chemotherapy Department, Oncology center No.1 City Clinical Hospital n.a. S.S.Yudin, 129090 - Moscow/RU
  • 2 Oncology Department, Oncology center No.1 City Clinical Hospital n.a. S.S.Yudin, 129090 - Moscow/RU
  • 3 Radiation Therapy, Moscow International Oncology Center, Moscow, Russian Federation;, 125481 - Moscow/RU
  • 4 Head And Neck Surgery Department, Oncology center No.1 City Clinical Hospital n.a. S.S.Yudin, 129090 - Moscow/RU
  • 5 Administration Department, Oncology center No.1 City Clinical Hospital n.a. S.S.Yudin, 129090 - Moscow/RU

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 437P

Background

Treatment strategy for very advanced unresectable head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) remains uncertain. Relevant guidelines suggest choosing between induction chemotherapy (ICT) followed by(chemo)radiotherapy (cRT) and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the role of ICT remains controversial considering the lack of overall survival benefit.

Methods

We performed a retrospective clinical study that included patients (pts) with unresectable stage III - IVa cancer of larynx, oropharynx and hypopharynx, who initiated ICT + cRT or CCRT since 01.01.2022 to 01.11.2023.

Results

A total of 176 pts were enrolled, 84 (48%) received CCRT with cisplatin or carboplatin and 92 (52%) – ICT with docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil for 3 cycles followed by cRT. The objective response rates were 75% in CCRT arm and 81% after completion of ICT + cRT (p=0.63). With a median follow-up duration of 8.7 months median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 7.6 and 9.4 months (Hazard ratio (HR) 0.67, 95% CI 0.43-1.04); 6-month OS was 65.7% and 92.8% in CCRT and ICT groups, respectively (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.30-0.85, р=0.01). After propensity score matching analysis the mPFS was significantly longer in ICT + cRT group than in CCRTgroup (HR=0.41, 95% CI 0.22-0.76). OS in the ICT + cRT group was significantly longer than in CCRT group (HR=0.28, 95% CI 0.13-0.62). Pts with most benefit from ICT had T stage of 3-4 (HR=0.29, 95% CI 0.14-0.59) and tumor location in oropharynx (HR=0.32 95% CI 0.12-0.83).

Conclusions

ICT+сRT resulted in improvement of PFS and OS compared to CCRT in pts with locally advanced HNSCC. The major benefit from ICT was observed in pts with oropharyngeal cancer and large primary tumors.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.