Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

282P - Prognostic outcome of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients: Real-world data from clinical practice at Siriraj Hospital

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Parinpat Angsuwarangsee

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1505-S1530. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1689

Authors

P. Angsuwarangsee1, P. Danchaivijitr2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 10700 - Bangkok/TH
  • 2 Division Of Medical Oncology, Mahidol University - Faculty of Medicine, 10700 - Bangkok/TH

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 282P

Background

The primary objective of this study is to compare the pathological complete response (pCR) rates between non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using ddMVAC (dose-dense methotrexate, vinblastine, adriamycin, and cisplatin) and GC (gemcitabine and cisplatin) prior to radical cystectomy (RC) versus those who underwent RC alone. Secondary endpoints include the comparison of pT0-1N0 rates, tumor downstaging, hospital length of stay, side effects of NAC, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

Methods

This retrospective study screened 1,918 patients diagnosed with bladder cancer from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2023. A total of 176 patients with MIBC, clinical stage T2-4, N0-3, M0, were included and divided into 3 groups: ddMVAC, GC, and upfront RC (23, 21, and 132 patients respectively). Data were collected from past medical records and analyzed using SPSS software version 29.

Results

The rates of pCR and pT0-1N0 were higher in patients treated with ddMVAC and GC compared to those undergoing RC alone (pCR: 36.4% and 30% vs. 12.9%; pT0-1N0: 50% and 35% vs. 15.9%), with statistical significance noted in the ddMVAC group (p = 0.011 for pCR; p < 0.001 for pT0-1N0). Tumor downstaging was more effectively achieved in the ddMVAC and GC groups compared to the RC alone group (p = 0.003). Operative time was similar across all groups (p > 0.05). Hospital stay was shorter for patients receiving GC compared to those undergoing RC alone (13 vs. 17 days; p = 0.039). DD-MVAC was associated with a lower incidence of neutropenia than GC (21.7% vs. 71.4%, p < 0.001), other side effects were similar between the two groups (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in PFS and OS among the groups (p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with ddMVAC and GC resulted in higher pCR and pT0-1N0 rates compared to RC alone, with statistically significant improvements noted with ddMVAC. DDMVAC and GC also enhanced tumor downstaging and reduced hospital stays compared to RC alone. DD-MVAC showed a lower rate of neutropenia compared to GC. No significant differences in PFS and OS were observed among the groups.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.