Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

394P - Post-marketing study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab biosimilar in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

K. H. Upveja

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1544-S1553. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1691

Authors

K.H. Upveja1, P. Mohapatra2, S. Deodhar3, R. Kapur1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Global Medical Affairs, Biocon Biologics Ltd, Bangalore, India, 2 Medical Oncology, Apollo Multi-Speciality Hospital, Kolkata, India, 3 Clinical Development Medical Affairs, Biocon Biologics Ltd, Bangalore, India

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 394P

Background

Data regarding the real-world use of bevacizumab biosimilar are limited from India. This abstract is focused on the safety and efficacy of biosimilar bevacizumab in the ovarian cancer (OC) cohort in a Phase-4 study from India.

Methods

This multi-center, single-arm, open-label, Phase-4 study assessed 225 patients, with almost half of them (n=112) being advanced OC patients. OC patients were administered biosimilar bevacizumab at 10/15 mg/kg depending on the line of therapy (frontline, platinum-sensitive relapse [PSR], or platinum-resistant relapse [PRR]) in combination with chemotherapy followed by maintenance as monotherapy. Total duration of study participation by each patient was 7 months.

Results

All patients were assessed for safety while efficacy was assessed for per protocol population. Among the OC cohort (n=112), 67 patients underwent surgery for primary disease and 65 patients completed the scheduled treatment while 47 discontinued the treatment (major reasons: patient decision-18, disease progression–10). The most commonly reported (≥10%) adverse events (AEs) in the study were weight loss in 16 (14.3%), followed by anemia, vomiting, and nausea (13 [11.6%] each). Serious AEs were reported in 18 patients (16.07%). Four patients reported grade 3 AEs of special interest, namely enterocutaneous fistula, female genital tract fistula, jejunal perforation, and hypersensitivity. Four deaths were reported in this study, but none was related to the drug. Among the OC efficacy population (n=99), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were reported as 46.5% and 74.7%, with no assessment for 18 patients (adjusted ORR=56.8%). ORR among PSR patients (n=43) was 65% and among PRR patients (n=18) was 33% (5 patients were frontline and 31 patients lacked platinum sensitivity assessment).

Conclusions

Among the OC efficacy population (n=99), overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were reported as 46.5% and 74.7%, with no assessment for 18 patients (adjusted ORR=56.8%). ORR among PSR patients (n=43) was 65% and among PRR patients (n=18) was 33% (5 patients were frontline and 31 patients lacked platinum sensitivity assessment).

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Biocon Biologics Ltd.

Funding

Biocon Biologics Ltd.

Disclosure

S. Deodhar, R. Kapur, K.H. Upveja: Financial Interests, Institutional, Full or part-time Employment: Biocon Biologics Ltd. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.