Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

620P - Pembrolizumab with radiotherapy versus pembrolizumab alone in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Klarasita Wibowo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1625-S1631. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1697

Authors

K. Wibowo1, C.L. Budiputri2, A.I. Chandra2, A.M.C. Agus2, A. Tancherla2, F. Dharmaraja1, F. Wijovi2, V. Angelica2, A. Kurniawan3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Faculty Of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, 15811 - Tangerang/ID
  • 2 Faculty Of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, 15810 - Tangerang/ID
  • 3 Department Of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Pelita Harapan University, 15810 - Tangerang/ID

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 620P

Background

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, arising from the epithelial cells of the lung. The prognosis of lung cancer remains poor, with a 5-year survival rate approximately at 15%. Several immunotherapy has been approved by FDA and has demonstrated clinical activity in NSCLC. Pembrolizumab, a humanized immunoglobulin G4 monoclonal antibody, is highly selective for programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1). To improve outcomes, efforts have been done by combining immunotherapy with radiotherapy (RT). Therefore, this meta-analysis aims to analyse the potential combination of pembrolizumab with radiotherapy (RT) compared with pembrolizumab alone for NSCLC.

Methods

Literature search was conducted from PubMed, PMC, Google Scholar and Science Direct with keywords include “Pembrolizumab” and “Radiotherapy” or “Radiation therapy” and “Non-small cell lung cancer”. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale is used to appraise each study, Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) to assess this review and funnel plot to detect publication bias. Generic inverse variance method were used to pool hazard ratio (HR) obtained from log-rank, univariate and multivariate cox regression of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

We included 2 randomized controlled trials (RCT) with 6 cohorts with a combined total of 1,087 patients. All studies were of high quality, minimal publication bias and GRADE shows to be moderate certainty. Patients receiving pembrolizumab with radiotherapy (RT) in log rank analysis have higher overall survival (OS) (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.57–0.81; p < 0.0001) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 0.63 95% CI 0.48–0.84; p = 0.002). Similar results also showed in univariate analysis of OS (HR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.58–1.00; p = 0.005) and PFS (HR 0.60; 95% CI, 0.48–0.75; p < 0.0001), and multivariate analysis of OS (HR 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68–0.92; p = 0.002) and PFS (HR 0.69; 95% CI, 0.59–0.81; p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab with radiotherapy is found to be more effective therapy for the management in non-small cell lung cancer when compared to pembrolizumab alone. However, further RCTs are required to confirm these findings.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

K. Wibowo.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.