Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

589P - Patient centricity in cancer: Overview past and current applications of patient reported outcomes

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Yvonne Lee

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1595-S1615. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1695

Authors

Y. Lee, S. Sridhar, J. Sarkar

Author affiliations

  • Real World Solutions, IQVIA Asia Pacific, 079906 - Singapore/SG

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 589P

Background

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is defined by US Food and Drug Administration as any report of the status of a patient’s health condition that comes directly from the patient without interpretation of the patient’s response by clinical or anyone else. Value of PROs measures have evolved over the years where few regulatory agencies have mandated to measure the success of clinical outcomes in regulatory decision making. PRO instruments are most often used in understanding of patient experience around their disease burden, symptoms, impacts, and preferences including treatment burden. There are no consensus or standardized methods on application on which PROs are best for regulatory approval, obtaining reimbursement, comparative effectiveness research, toxicity assessment, health-related quality of life (QOL) or symptom monitoring.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search on PubMed was performed using generative artificial intelligence to identify studies published in English from 1 January 2004 to 16 July 2024. The following keywords were searched: patient reported outcomes, patient centered research, clinical effectiveness, oncology, health economics outcome research, validated instruments, questionnaire, interview, survey, US, Canada, EU5 (France, Germany, Italy, Spain, UK) and Asia Pacific (APAC).

Results

A total of 2,611 articles were screened. US led in generation of PROs data followed by EU5, APAC and Canada. The PROs were most frequently used to assess treatment impact on QOL (41.7%), monitor patient’s symptoms (23.5%) while less than 10% PROs data were generated for regulators and payers. Cancer specific PROs measures were most reported among breast cancer patients proceeded by genitourinary cancer, thoracic cancer, and gynecological cancer. Across the regions, 8% of PROs studies were conducted without ethics approval.

Conclusions

Emerging evidence demonstrated PROs significantly improve patient cancer care through strengthening patient-clinician communication, QOL, and economic benefits. With growing importance of patient voice and shift of patient centricity in cancer patient care, PROs measures will become a standard practice in research and clinic despite limitations to using PROs in practice.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

IQVIA Asia Pacific.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

Y. Lee, S. Sridhar, J. Sarkar: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: IQVIA Asia Pacific.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.