Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

534P - Pain reduction, feasibility, and quality of life of 2% lidocaine spray versus 2% lidocaine oral viscous solution for head and neck cancer patients with chemoradiation-induced mucositis: A randomized pilot study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Kompreeya Upalananda

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1595-S1615. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1695

Authors

K. Upalananda1, J. Chantharasamee2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, 10700 - Bangkok/TH
  • 2 Oncology Department, Mahidol University - Faculty of Medicine - Siriraj Hospital, 10700 - Bangkok/TH

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 534P

Background

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is the seventh most common cancer globally and among the top five in Thailand. Chemotherapy-induced mucositis affects about 90% of patients undergoing combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The use of 2% lidocaine oral viscous is limited by its portability issues, difficulty swallowing, and unpleasant taste. This study aimed to compare the effects of 2% peppermint lidocaine spray with conventional 2% lidocaine oral viscous on immediate pain reduction (at 0 and 5 minutes), feasibility, and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients undergoing concurrent cisplatin and radiation-induced mucositis.

Methods

This open-label, randomized controlled trial randomized patients using blocks of four into two groups. A research nurse collected data on pain scores and quality of life using the modified Oral Mucositis Weekly Questionnaires-Head and Neck Cancer (OMWQ-HN), which includes 2-item and 12-item versions. A feasibility score (1 to 5) was assessed at the end of treatment, and product usage was monitored weekly until the completion of the radiation course.

Results

Forty-five patients participated. The median radiation dose was similar in both groups. Initial baseline pain scores were comparable (1.65 in the spray group vs. 2.18 in the viscous group, p=0.095). Immediate pain reduction scores did not significantly differ (2.76 for spray vs. 2.28 for viscous, p=0.46). There were no significant differences in 12-item OMWQ-HN scores. However, the spray group reported better global health and quality of life according to the 2-item OMWQ-HN and was more feasible to use (p=0.001) and preferred in taste (p=0.034) compared to the viscous group.

Conclusions

The 2% peppermint lidocaine spray enhances patient satisfaction and quality of life in head and neck cancer patients with chemoradiation-induced mucositis, without compromising pain control efficacy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Routine to Research Unit Siriraj Hospital.

Funding

Routine to Research Unit Siriraj Hospital.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.