Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

421P - Induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin for T4 nasoethmoidal squamous cell carcinoma: The value of paclitaxel, carboplatin and cetuximab (PCE)

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Nobukazu Tanaka

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1554-S1574. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1692

Authors

N. Tanaka1, T. Enokida1, S. Okano1, T. Fujisawa1, R. Onaga1, Y. Hoshi1, H. Tanaka1, A. Wada1, M. Sato1, N. Takeshita1, T. Fujisawa2, S. Zenda2, M. Tahara1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Head And Neck Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 277-8577 - Kashiwa/JP
  • 2 Department Of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 277-8577 - Kashiwa/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 421P

Background

Locally advanced nasoethmoidal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is rare, and often unsuitable for surgical resection. Data on the potential clinical benefits of combining induction chemotherapy (IC) and sequential definitive chemoradiotherapy for this condition is limited.

Methods

We retrospectively investigated T4 nasoethmoidal SCC patients who underwent proton or photon chemoradiotherapy with curative intent at the National Cancer Center Hospital East between April 2014 and May 2022. Patients were categorized into three groups based on IC regimen: no IC (No-IC), paclitaxel plus carboplatin plus cetuximab (IC-PCE), and docetaxel plus cisplatin plus S-1 (IC-TPS).

Results

Twenty-five patients were analyzed (No IC, 9; IC-PCE, 10; and IC-TPS, 6). All patients exhibited a performance status of 0 or 1, with a median age of 58 years (range: 28-73) at the initiation of treatment. The IC-PCE group had the highest ratio of Stage IVB to IVA patients. IC-PCE and IC-TPS yielded objective responses in eight (80%) and two (33%) patients, respectively. During IC-TPS, five patients (83%) experienced a total of nine grade 3/4 adverse events, and two (20%) experienced one grade 3 event each during IC-PCE. All subjects completed proton beam therapy (65–70 GyE, n=20) or intensity-modulated radiation therapy (70 Gy, n=5), with median relative to dose intensity of concurrent cisplatin reaching 100% in all groups. After completion of planned treatment, complete responses were observed in 22 patients, and three patients in the No IC or IC-TPS group showed a partial response. On median follow-up of 42 months, 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate was 90.0% in the IC-PCE group and 33.3% in the remaining groups. Of note, the IC-PCE group had significantly better RFS (median RFS: IC-PCE, not reached; IC-TPS, 24.1 months; No IC, 16.8 months; log-rank p-value, 0.023), despite no differences in overall survival, time-to-locoregional progression, or time-to-distant metastasis.

Conclusions

Sequential IC-PCE followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin appears promising as an effective therapeutic strategy for T4 nasoethmoidal SCC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.