Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

696P - Impact of local therapy on survival in patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A real-world cohort study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Lige Wu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1632-S1678. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1698

Authors

L. Wu1, X. Hao2, J. Liu1, P. Xing1, J. Li1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021 - beijing/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 696P

Background

Clinically, it is controversial whether local therapy for brain metastases (BMs) can improve the survival of patients with NSCLC.

Methods

A cohort of NSCLC patients with BMs was retrospectively assembled and categorized. The patients in the local-therapy group were recipients of both regional interventions for BMs and systemic treatments, whereas the control group received systemic therapy exclusively. Statistical analysis, including the Chi-square test and survival curve evaluation, was subsequently conducted to validate the study findings.

Results

From Sept 2021 to Sept 2023, a total of 75 patients were included in local-therapy group and 43 in control group. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of gender, age, pathological subtype, driver gene mutation profile, the count of BMs, and the initial systemic therapies following discovery of BMs. As of July 10, 2024, the median PFS was 21.25 months (95% CI 16.06-26.44m) in local-therapy group and 17.96 months (95% CI 10.10-25.83m) in control group (hazard ratio 1.14 [95% CI 0.76-1.72], p=0.536). The median OS was 58.79 months (95% CI 49.34-68.24m) in local-therapy group and 46.79 months (95% CI 32.48-61.09m) in control group (hazard ratio 0.79 [95% CI 0.45-1.40], p=0.387). In a subgroup analysis of patients with EGFR mutations, the median PFS was 20.75 months (95% CI 15.96-25.54m) in local-therapy group and 17.18 months (95% CI 12.82-21.54m) in control group (hazard ratio 1.10 [95% CI 0.68-1.78], p=0.709). The median OS was 55.14 months (95% CI 30.70-79.59m) in local-therapy group and 41.11 months (95% CI 25.02-57.19m) in control group (hazard ratio 0.85 [95% CI 0.44-1.62], p=0.598). These findings collectively indicate that the local therapy of BMs does not confer a survival benefit to patients with NSCLC. Furthermore, our data revealed that local therapy alleviated central nervous system (CNS) symptoms in 66.67% (14/21) of patients experiencing such symptoms.

Conclusions

Local therapy cannot extend survival in NSCLC patients with BMs. Consequently, active local treatment should be withheld for patients experiencing asymptomatic BMs unless it is imperative to alleviate CNS symptoms.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.