Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

41P - Impact of HER2-low and HER2-zero status on metastatic hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer patients treated with first-line aromatase inhibitors, with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors: A multicenter retrospective analysis

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Thiti Susiriwatananont

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1418-S1425. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1685

Authors

T. Susiriwatananont1, C. Wongkraisri2, T. Dajsakdipon3, A. Supavavej4, A. Dechaphunkul5, P. Sunpaweravong5, S. Neesanun6, S. Ithimakin2, T. Dejthevaporn3, N. Parinyanitikul1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital - Thai Red Cross Society, 10330 - Bangkok/TH
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, Siriraj Hospital, 10700 - Bangkok/TH
  • 3 Department Of Medicine, Mahidol University - Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, 10400 - Bangkok/TH
  • 4 Medical Oncology Department, Chulabhorn Hospital, 10210 - Bangkok/TH
  • 5 Medicine Department, Prince of Songkla University, Faculty of Medicine, 90110 - Hat Yai/TH
  • 6 Internal Medicine Department, Sawan Pracharak Hospital, 60000 - Nakhon Sawan/TH

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 41P

Background

HER2-low status is a predictive factor for high-potency anti-HER2 therapy in metastatic hormonal receptor-positive breast cancer (HR+ MBC). However, the impact of HER2-low status on hormonal therapy remains uncertain. We aimed to explore the effect of HER2-low and HER-2 zero in HR+ MBC patients treated with first-line aromatase inhibitors (AI) with or without CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i).

Methods

Post-menopausal patients or pre-menopausal patients who received ovarian function suppression diagnosed with HR+ MBC between 2017-2022 and treated with first-line AI with or without CDK4/6 inhibitors from six tertiary hospitals in Thailand were retrospectively reviewed. Comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were made in unadjusted cohorts and after adjustment of baseline characteristics (age, ECOG, de novo metastasis, treatment-free interval, visceral metastasis, and number of metastatic site) with stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting (sIPTW).

Results

Of 504 patients, 219 (43.5%) had HER2-low, and 285 (56.5%) had HER2-zero. The median age at diagnosis of advanced breast cancer was 60 (range 22-84) in HER2-low cohort and 61 (range 18-89) in HER2-zero cohort. CDK4/6i+AI was administered to 52.5% and 43.9% of patients in the HER2-low and HER-2 zero cohorts, respectively. 72% of patients received ribociclib and 28% received palbociclib. The median follow-up time was 29 months (18-38) for CDK4/6i+AI and 35 months (20.5-53) for AI. The data cut-off date was September 30, 2023. Outcomes of AI with or without CDK4/6i in HER2-low and HER-2 zero metastatic HR+ breast cancer Table: 41P

Unadjusted sIPTW
HER2-low CDK4/6i+AI (n=115) AI(n=104) HR p CDK4/6+AI(n=109) AI(n=106) HR p
mPFS(m) 25.2 22.3 0.91 0.56 25.5 18 0.68 0.03
mOS(m) 49.3 51.3 0.88 0.59 52.4 37.9 0.55 <0.01
HER2-zero CDK4/6+AI(n=125) AI(n=160) HR p CDK4/6+AI(n=129) AI(n=162) HR p
mPFS(m) 26.1 14.9 0.64 <0.01 25.5 12.8 0.62 <0.01
mOS(m) 55.7 42.3 0.76 0.12 45.9 38.4 0.67 0.08
CDK4/6+AI HER2-low(n=115) HER2-zero(n=125) HR p HER-2low(n=115) HER2-zero(n=125) HR p
mPFS(m) 25.2 26.1 1.03 0.88 26.6 25.6 0.93 0.69
mOS(m) 49.3 55.7 0.83 0.44 52.4 55.7 0.72 0.16
AI HER2-low(n=104) HER2-zero(n=160) HR p HER2-low(n=104) HER2-zero(n=159) HR p
mPFS(m) 22.3 14.9 0.74 0.04 20.4 16.2 0.86 0.31
mOS(m) 51.3 42.3 0.75 0.07 43.9 47 0.97 0.86
.

Conclusions

CDK4/6i+AI yielded better outcomes compared to AI alone in both HER2-low and HER2-zero metastatic HR+ breast cancer. HER2-low status did not affect prognosis in patients receiving either CDK4/6i+AI or AI alone.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

P. Sunpaweravong: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Roche, Eisai, BMS, AstraZeneca, MSD, Pfizer, Amgen; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, BMS, Mundipharma, Bayer; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Roche, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD. S. Ithimakin: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Novartis, Zuellig Pharma, AstraZeneca. T. Dejthevaporn: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Zeullig Pharma, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Dr. Reddy, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, paid as a fee for service delivered: Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI, paid as a fee for service delivered through institution: Pfizer. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.