Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

244P - Impact of genomic profiling testing on treatment outcomes in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine carcinoma

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Toshiki Ozato

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

T. Ozato1, Y. Kono2, H. Yamamoto3, A. Hirasawa3, D. Ennishi4, S. Tomida4, S. Toyooka4, M. Otsuka2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gastroenterology, Okayama University Hospital, 700-8558 - Okayama/JP
  • 2 Gastroenterology And Hepatology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine,Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 700-8558 - Okayama/JP
  • 3 Clinical Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 700-8558 - Okayama/JP
  • 4 Center For Comprehensive Genomic Medicine, Okayama University Hospital, 700-8558 - Okayama/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 244P

Background

Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gastrointestinal tract (GI-NEC) is a rare disease with no established effective treatment. This study investigated the utility of comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) testing for GI-NEC.

Methods

We analyzed 203 cases who were diagnosed with primary GI-NEC and were registered in the Center for Cancer Genomics and Advanced Therapeutics (C-CAT) utilization portal between June 2019 and June 2024. Clinical and pathological features, as well as genomic profiling results, were examined to determine their association with prognosis.

Results

The median age of all cases was 68 years, with 144 males and 59 females. Performance status was 0 in 122 cases, 1 in 67 cases, 2 in 4 cases, and unknown in 10 cases. Target Sequencing panels (124-737 genes) were used to detect driver mutations. Genes with frequently observed variants were TP53 (83%), RB1 (32%), APC (31%), CCNE1 (19%), MYC (18%), and KRAS (17%). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model revealed that MYC mutations (HR 3.2, 95% CI 1.6-6.6) and KRAS mutations (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.2-4.7) were significant prognostic factors. Druggable variants (such as KRAS, CDKN2A, and BRAF mutation) were identified in 74 cases (36%), and 15 cases (7.4%) received corresponding treatments.

Conclusions

The CGP testing for GI-NEC may be useful for identifying effective treatment options and predicting prognosis. Thus, Implementing the CGP test at the time of diagnosis is expected to broaden the range of treatment strategies for GI-NEC patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

S. Toyooka: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Lecture fee: Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. and Guardant Health, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.