Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

226P - Immune checkpoint inhibitor rechallenge in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jing-Kun Chen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

J. Chen, J. Su, N. Peng, L. Ma, J. Zhong

Author affiliations

  • Hepatobiliary Surgery, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, 530021 - Nanning/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 226P

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is prone to primary or secondary drug resistance, or severe immune-related adverse events (irAE) when treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study explored the efficacy and safety of reinitiating ICI treatment in patients with advanced HCC who have developed ICIs resistance or severe irAEs after initial ICI therapy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on baseline and follow-up data from patients with advanced HCC who switched to another ICI following resistance or severe irAEs to the initial ICI. Progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), best overall response (BOR), and irAEs were analyzed for both ICI treatments. Patients receiving their first ICI were designated as the ICI-1 cohort, and those undergoing ICI rechallenge were designated as the ICI-2 cohort.

Results

From March 2019 to March 2024, 805 patients with advanced HCC received ICI treatment, among whom 54 patients who switched to another ICI due to resistance or severe irAEs were included in the analysis. These comprised 50 males (92.5%) and 4 females (7.5%), with a median age of 50 years (range: 28-70 years). The median treatment durations for the ICI-1 and ICI-2 cohorts were 5.6 months (range: 1.4-13.3) and 4.2 months (range: 1.4-11.9), respectively. ICI treatment modalities included ICI monotherapy (ICI-1, n=8 (14.8%); ICI-2, n=6 (11.1%)) and ICI combined with targeted therapy (ICI-1, n=46 (85.2%); ICI-2, n=48 (88.9%)). Among the 54 patients, 95.0% (n=52) switched ICI due to disease progression. The median PFS was 5.0 months (95% CI: 4.3-7.0) in ICI-1 cohort and 3.8 months (95% CI: 3.5-7.0) in ICI-2 cohort. The ORRs for the ICI-1 and ICI-2 cohorts were 24.0% and 18.5%, respectively. Four patients achieved objective responses in both the ICI-1 and ICI-2 cohorts, and among the 10 patients with objective responses in the ICI-2 cohort, 2 (20.0%) had experienced disease progression during ICI-1 treatment. Four patients (7.4%) in the ICI-1 cohort and 5 patients (9.3%) in the ICI-2 cohort experienced grade 3 irAEs.

Conclusions

ICI rechallenge in patients with advanced HCC due to resistance or severe irAEs can still benefit some patients, and no new safety signals have been observed.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

the Ethics Committee of Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital.

Funding

This work was supported by the Specific Research Project of Guangxi for Research Bases and Talents (GuiKe AD22035057), Guangxi Key Research and Development Plan Project (GuiKe AB24010082), First-class Discipline Innovation-Driven Talent Program of Guangxi Medical University.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.