Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

348P - Enzalutamide vs abiraterone plus prednisolone for elderly CRPC patients: From the ENABLE phase III trial

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Kouji Izumi

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1531-S1543. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1690

Authors

K. Izumi1, R. Nakagawa2, A. Mizokami1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Integrative Cancer Therapy And Urology, Kanazawa University Hospital, 920-8641 - Kanazawa/JP
  • 2 Urology, Kanazawa University, 920-8641 - Kanazawa/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 348P

Background

Elderly CRPC patients are hardly focused by clinical trials, and data regarding outcomes of second generation androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs) is limited.

Methods

The ENABLE study for PCa, an investigator-initiated, multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing between enzalutamide (ENZ) and abiraterone plus prednisolone (ABI) was conducted in Japan. We analyzed the efficacy of these ARSIs for older (75 years or older) patients. Prespecified survival endpoints and safety profiles were compared between older and younger (<75 years) patients and between ENZ and ABI in older patients.

Results

The number of younger and older patients was 41 and 51 in the ENZ arm and 36 and 56 in the ABI arm, respectively. Median time to PSA progression (TTPP) of younger and older patients was 15.2 and 21.2 months (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.53-1.33, P=0.4647) and median overall survival (OS) of them was 33.7 and 37.8 months (HR 0.80, 95%CI 0.50-1.29, P=0.3651), respectively. Among 107 older patients, TTPP of the ENZ and ABI arm was 21.2 and 10.1 months (HR 0.65, 95%CI 0.36-1.17, P=0.1506) and OS of them was 37.8 and 44.7 months (HR 0.97, 95%CI 0.51-1.84, P=0.9321), respectively. However, the ENZ arm showed better percentage of PSA response rate than the ABI arm (75% vs 53%, P=0.0421). Similar adverse event rates and grades were observed in younger and older patients.

Conclusions

ARSIs showed similar efficacy and safety profiles in younger and older patients. ENZ may be a better choice for older patients with favorable PSA response rate.

Clinical trial identification

UMIN000015529.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

The Japanese Foundation for Multidisciplinary Treatment of Cancer.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.