Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

659P - EGFR p.E709X point mutation in advanced NSCLC: Molecular characteristics and precise therapeutic strategy exploration

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Lanlan Pang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1632-S1678. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1698

Authors

L. Pang1, W. Fang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, 510060 - Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Department Of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University, 510275 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 659P

Background

There is still a certain lack of preclinical and clinical understanding of NSCLC with EGFR exon 18 mutations. The present study aimed to elucidate the molecular characteristics of lung cancer with rare EGFR p.E709X point mutation (the second most prevalent exon 18 mutation behind EGFR p.G719X) and propose the optimal treatment strategies.

Methods

This study explored the “Burning Rock Medical Genome Database” (N=44,993) to reveal the genetic mutation characteristics of EGFR p.E709X. In addition, this study also included a real-world cohort of EGFR p.E709X mutant NSCLC patients (n=78) diagnosed in multi-centers in China to evaluate their clinical treatment response to different treatment regimens. A drug sensitivity experiment was also utilized to confirm the clinical finding.

Results

The EGFR p.E709X mutation occurs in approximately 1.5% of patients with EGFR mutations. Based on the mutational status of concurrent EGFR genetic alterations, EGFR p.E709X missense mutations could be divided into 3 categories: EGFR p.E709X/G719X; EGFR p.E709X/L858R and single EGFR p.E709X. For patients with EGFR p.E709X/G719X mutations or single EGFR p.E709X mutations, the therapeutic effect of afatinib is better than first-generation/third-generation EGFR-TKIs (first-generation EGFR-TKIs vs. afatinib vs. third-generation EGFR-TKIs vs. chemotherapy, ORR: 25.00% vs. 64.71% vs. 0.00% vs. 80.00%, median PFS: 7.59 vs. 11.50 vs. 4.56 vs. 5.93 months, P=0.12). However, for patients with EGFR p.E709X/L858R mutations, both afatinib or first-generation EGFR-TKIs showed favorable therapeutic effects (first-generation EGFR-TKIs vs. afatinib vs. third-generation EGFR-TKIs vs. chemotherapy, ORR: 75.00% vs.44.44% vs.16.67% vs.0.00%, median PFS: 12.98 vs.6.57 vs.5.03 vs.2.45 months, P=0.035). EGFR p.T790M mutation (16.7%) composed the most common resistance mechanism in patients with EGFR p.E709X mutation after progression on afatinib or first-generation EGFR-TKIs.

Conclusions

Incorporating the largest cohort of patients with NSCLC with EGFR p.E709X mutations, this study proposed the optimal treatment strategy based on molecular classification and first explored the resistance mechanism after EGFR-TKIs progression.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Chinese National Natural Science Foundation Project (82173101, and 8237262), the Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, and the 308-Program for Clinical Research of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.