Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

558P - Efficacy of NEPA for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in cancer patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy and usefulness of adding olanzapine for prior grade 2 or higher emesis

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jaemin Na

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1595-S1615. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1695

Authors

J. Na1, K. Park2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Student (undergraduate), Hanyang University College of Medicine, 04763 - Seoul/KR
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Hanyang University Hospital, 04763 - Seoul/KR

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 558P

Background

NEPA has demonstrated superiority in preventing chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) compared to palonosetron and non-inferiority compared to Aprepitant/Granisetron. However, despite the application of NEPA in previous studies, grade (Gr) 2 or higher CINV was reported in 30-50% of cases. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy of NEPA for CINV prevention in Korean cancer patients treated with HEC, and to evaluate the usefulness of adding olanzapine in cases experiencing Gr 2 or higher CINV in previous cycles.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on cancer patients treated with HEC and CINV prophylaxis using NEPA. If Gr 2 or higher CINV occurred, olanzapine 5mg/day was administered for 5 days. The primary endpoint was the incidence of Gr 2 or higher CINV during cycle 1. Secondary endpoints included the efficacy of adding olanzapine and identification of risk factors for Gr2 or higher CINV.

Results

Of 164 patients, 142 patients were analyzed. The median age was 66.0 years, and males were 54.9%. Tumor sites included biliary tract (45%), genitourinary (27%), and breast (9%). The HEC regimens included cisplatin <50 mg/m2 (49%), cisplatin ≥50 mg/m2 (20%), Carboplatin > AUC 4.0 (18%), and doxorubicin (12%). The incidence of Gr 2 or higher CINV was 23% (33/142), and the incidence of all-grade CINV was 58% (82/142). Among those with Gr 2 or higher CINV, 82% (27/33) were treated with olanzapine combination without dose modification of HEC, and 74% (20/27) improved to Gr 1 CINV.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that NEPA was comparably effective in Korean patients treated with HEC, and also showed efficacy of olanzapine combination therapy. Further studies needed to confirm CINV prophylaxis strategies, either through initial combination with olanzapine in high-risk CINV cases or by adding olanzapine in patients with prior Gr2 or higher CINV.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Institutional Review Board of Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.