Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

240P - Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with tislelizumab and TKIs versus TACE for the treatment of Intermediate and advanced HCC: A retrospective cohort study

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Yue Han

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

Y. Han, S. Tang, Y. Gao, X. Yan, W. Zhi, T. Gong

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Interventional Therapy, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, 100021 - Beijing/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 240P

Background

TACE combined with targeted therapy and immunotherapy represents a potentially effective treatment for intermediate and advanced HCC. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TACE combined with tislelizumab and TKIs versus TACE among this population.

Methods

Data from 62 patients (pts) with intermediate and advanced HCC from June 2017 to September 2023 were analyzed retrospectively. The pts were divided into two groups: group 1 (30 pts) received TACE supplemented with tislelizumab and TKIs (76.7% pts receiving Lenvatinib), and group 2 (32 pts) underwent TACE. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

There were no significant differences in baseline parameters between two groups (P>0.05). The average follow-up was 10.7 months(m), median PFS were 11.1 m (95%CI, 9.6-NA) in group 1 and 3.8 m (95%CI, 0.9-6.7) in group 2 (hazard ratio [HR], 1.97 [95CI, 1.08-3.60], P=0.027). The 12-m and 18-m OS rates were higher in group 1 than group 2 (75% vs 51%; 68% vs 47%). The ORR and DCR were higher in group 1 than group 2 (ORR, 46.7% [CR 4, PR 10] vs 18.8% [CR 2, PR 4], P=0.029; DCR, 96.7% vs 75.0%, P=0.027; mRECIST). 4 pts (13.3%) in group 1 received curative treatment after reaching CR or PR, including 2 curative hepatic resection, and 2 ablation. Adverse event (AE) rates were 86.7% (group 1) and 81.3% (group 2) respectively, while grade 3 or higher AEs occurred at rates of 10.0% in group 1 in total, with none observed in group 2. Table: 240P

Baseline characteristics

Characteristics TACE+Tislelizumab+TKIs (n=30) TACE (n=32) P value
Median age (range), years 55 (30-75) 60.5 (36-78) 0.409
Male, n(%) 28 (93.3) 29 (90.6) 1.000
BCLC stage, n(%), B/C 16 (53.3)/14 (46.7) 16 (50.0)/16 (50.0) 0.805
ECOG PS, n(%), 0/1 26 (86.7)/4 (13.3) 27 (84.4)/5 (15.6) 1.000
Child-Pugh, n(%), A/B 19 (63.3)/11 (36.7) 24 (75.0)/8 (25.0) 0.411
MVI present, n(%) 11 (36.7) 16 (50.0) 0.317
EHS present, n(%) 7 (23.3) 7 (21.9) 1.000
Median number of TACE 3 2 0.399

Conclusions

Compared to TACE, TACE combined with tislelizumab and TKIs is expected to be a safe and effective treatment for intermediate and advanced HCC. The combined therapy could be regarded as a considerable option for conversion strategy in this population.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.