Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

766P - Efficacy and safety of concurrent bevacizumab in combination with standard radiotherapy and temozolomide followed by bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide and surufatinib in glioblastoma: A phase II clinical trial

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Hui Zhang

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1679-S1697. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1699

Authors

H. Zhang, R. Tao

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Department, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, 250117 - Jinan/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 766P

Background

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a disease with high mortality reported worldwide. Stupp protocol is a common option to pts with GBM. Surufatinib (SUR) is a TKI which demonstrated encouraging efficacy in neuroendocrine tumors and other cancers. We conducted this study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a modified stupp protocol with SUR.

Methods

The main eligibility criteria included radiographically or histologically proven GBM, age between 18 and 75 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) less than 2, and a Karnofsky performance scales (KPS) no less than 60. The pts would receive radiotherapy at a dose of 2 Gy per day 5 times in a week for 6 weeks, orally concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) 75mg/m2 daily for up to 7 weeks, and intravenously bevacizumab (BEV) 7.5mg/kg every 21 days for up to 3 times. For adjuvant treatment, the pts would receive orally TMZ 150 (escalated to 200 if no AE with grade greater than 2 occurred) mg/m2 on day 1 to day 5 weekly and orally BEV on day 1 and day 15 in 28-day cycles for 12 weeks, and afterwards orally SUR 150/200 mg as appropriate daily until intolerable toxicity or progressive disease. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

From Dec 8, 2021 to Jul 8, 2024, 40 pts were enrolled. IDH mutation detection was performed in 21 pts, and 12 pts were IDH mutant. Ki-67 immunohistochemistry was performed in 30 pts, and 12 pts had a ki-67 index no less than 30. With a median follow-up of 5.13 months, the median PFS was 7 (95% CI: 4-8) months. The 3-month, 6-month, 9-month, and 12-month PFS rate was 79.49 (95% CI: 66.81-92.16) %, 51.28 (95% CI: 35.59-66.97) %, 20.51 (95% CI: 7.84-33.19) %, and 12.82 (95% CI: 2.33-23.31) %, respectively. No pts died during the following-up. 39 pts had at least one post-baseline tumor assessment. One patient achieved CR, 10 pts achieved PR, 8 patients had stable disease, and 20 pts experienced progressive disease. The ORR was 28.21% (11/39), and the DCR was 48.72% (19/39).

Conclusions

The modified STUPP protocol followed by surufatinib as maintenance therapy demonstrated promising outcomes in GBM, which warrants further explorations.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

The authors thank all the patients involved in this study. We also thank Chao Zhao and Zheng Wang from HUTCHMED for the assistance in data analysis and writing.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.