Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

186P - Efficacy and safety between weekly and monthly neoadjuvant cisplatin and fluorouracil chemoradiotherapy regimens in locoregional esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Cheng-Lun Lai

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

C. Lai1, C. Lin2, H. Tzeng1, C. Chen3, C. Chuang4, C. Chou1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Medical Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705 - Taichung City/TW
  • 2 Division Of Hematology, Department Of Medicine, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705 - Taichung City/TW
  • 3 Radiation Oncology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705 - Taichung City/TW
  • 4 Division Of Thoracic Surgery, Department Of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 40705 - Taichung City/TW

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 186P

Background

The monthly four-day infusion of cisplatin (P) combined with fluorouracil (F) is commonly used as a neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) regimen for locoregional esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Nonetheless, a weekly PF regimen has achieved a comparable disease control rate in various cancer types and different situations. We aim to evaluate the difference in efficacy and safety between the weekly and monthly PF nCRT regimens in locoregional ESCC.

Methods

A retrospective review was conducted on the medical records and cancer registry database at the Taichung Veterans General Hospital (Taichung, Taiwan) between January 2020 and December 2023. Patients with histologically proven ESCC who received nCRT with the PF regimen were enrolled. Patients in the weekly group received weekly P (20 mg/m2) and F (800 mg/m2) for at least 6 cycles. Patients in the monthly group received monthly treatment of continuous infusion with P (20 mg/m2) and F (800 mg/m2) over 96 hours for 2 cycles. Clinical features, responses and safety profiles were compared.

Results

A total of 146 patients were analyzed. Fifty of them (34.2%) received weekly PF, and another 96 of them (65.8%) received monthly PF nCRT. The baseline characteristics were similar. There was no statistically significant difference in the clinical response rate (66.0% vs 71.9%; p = 0.719) and clinical complete response rate (32.0% vs 34.4%; p = 0.733). Grade 3 to 4 adverse events during nCRT were comparable (14.0% vs 15.6%; p = 0.795). Thirty-five of 50 (70.0%) in the weekly group and 77 of 96 (80.2%) in the monthly group underwent esophagectomy (p = 0.166). Table: 186P

Weekly PF n = 50 Monthly PF n = 96 p-value
Clinical complete response 16 (32.0%) 33 (34.4%) 0.733
Esophagectomy 35 (70.0%) 77 (80.2%) 0.166
Grade 3-4 adverse events 7 (14.0%) 15 (15.6%) 0.795

Conclusions

Owing to similar response rates and safety profiles, the weekly PF regimen could be a potential alternative to the monthly PF regimen for nCRT in patients with locoregional ESCC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.