Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

673P - Diagnosis and treatment of ROS1 fusion-positive non-small-cell lung cancer in China: Preliminary report of a nationwide survey

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Fei Zhou

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1632-S1678. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1698

Authors

F. Zhou1, C. Zhou2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Shanghai East/Oriental Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University - Southern Division, 200031 - Shanghai/CN
  • 2 Medical Oncology Department, Shanghai East/Oriental Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University - Headquarters/Northern Division, 200120 - Shanghai/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 673P

Background

Approximately 2.59% of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor ROS1 fusion in China, while the latest status of diagnosis and treatment for them remains unclear.

Methods

The cross-sectional survey was conducted in 31 provinces in China. It planned to enroll 53 clinicians and 10 patients for qualitative survey, 262 clinicians and 101 patients for quantitative survey. Eligible clinicians had treated at least 5 NSCLC patients within the last 6 months, and patients were diagnosed with ROS1 fusion NSCLC. This report only presents the preliminary findings from the clinicians.

Results

From October 2023 to June 2024, 153 clinicians from 54 cities were involved in this survey. The ROS1 fusion gene testing recommendation rate in squamous and adenocarcinoma was 60.8% and 100%, respectively. However, only 59.0% of clinicians believed the actual testing rate of adenocarcinoma exceeded 90%. The main reasons for not accepting gene test were financial factors (81.0%) and low treatment willingness (45.1%). PCR (66.7%) and NGS (67.3%) were the main methods, 68.6% of clinicians conducted in-hospital testing routinely, while the out-of-hospital testing rate was significantly higher in hospitals in third-tier cities (p =0.004). 93.5% of clinicians preferred targeted therapy as the first-line treatment, with crizotinib the most frequently used (97.2%), followed by entrectinib (33.6%). For second-line therapy, 44.4% of clinicians recommended primarily chemotherapy (98.5%) as non- targeted therapy, while 33.3% opt for targeted therapy, with entrectinib (74.5%) used most. Clinicians in third-tier cities were less likely to prescribe targeted drug (p =0.004) as second-line therapy. Gastrointestinal reactions (85.0%) and liver or kidney function abnormalities (77.0%) were the most common adverse reactions. Only 5.0% of clinicians believed that the overall survival of patients with ROS1 fusion NSCLC could exceed 5 years.

Conclusions

We find that the actual rate of gene testing and in-hospital testing is relatively low and options for second-line targeted therapies are limited. There is an imbalance across hospitals in different tiers of city. 5-year survival rate of ROS1 NSCLC patients needs further improvement.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

This survey was funded by Pfizer.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.