Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

677P - Comparison of performance of MET amplification detection by FISH, NGS and ddPCR in EGFRm advanced NSCLC patients post first-line osimertinib treatment failure: Analysis from a prospective, multi-center study in China

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Puyuan Xing

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1632-S1678. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1698

Authors

P. Xing1, D. Lv2, W. Feng3, S. Liu4, Y. Yu5, J. Yin6, X. Ren7, J. Zhang8, G. Han9, Y. Zhang10, S. Cang11, J. Chen12, E. Chen13, L. Meng14, Y. Zhang15, Y. Shi1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Beijing Key Laboratory Of Clinical Study On Anticancer Molecular Targeted Drugs, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, 100021 - Beijing/CN
  • 2 Department Of Breath Internal Medicine, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, 317000 - Taizhou/CN
  • 3 Pulmonary Oncology Department, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, 528000 - Foshan/CN
  • 4 Department Of Thoracic Oncology Surgery, Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, 350000 - Fuzhou/CN
  • 5 Department Of Respiratory Medicine, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, 150081 - Harbin/CN
  • 6 Pulmonary And Critical Care Medicine, The Third People's Hospital of Chengdu, Southwest Jiaotong University, Chongqing Medical University, 610072 - Chengdu/CN
  • 7 Department Of Biotherapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, 300060 - Tianjin/CN
  • 8 Department Of Respiratory And Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China (Anhui Provincial Hospital), 471002 - Hefei/CN
  • 9 Department Of Oncology, The People's Hospital of Taizhou, Taizhou Medical School, Jiangsu and Nantong University, 317000 - Jiangsu/CN
  • 10 Department Of Lung/gastrointestinal Oncology, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, 410013 - Changsha, Hunan/CN
  • 11 Department Of Oncology, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, 450003 - Zhengzhou/CN
  • 12 Department Of Oncology, The Second Hospital of Dalian Medical University, 116027 - Dalian/CN
  • 13 Department Of Pulmonary And Critical Care Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, 310016 - Hangzhou/CN
  • 14 Department Of Oncology, Rizhao People's Hospital, 276826 - Rizhao, Shandong Province/CN
  • 15 Department Of Pulmonary And Critical Care Medicine, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, 200031 - Shanghai/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 677P

Background

MET amplification (amp) is a key resistance mechanism in EGFR mutant (EGFRm) advanced NSCLC patients (pts) post first-line (1L) osimertinib (osi) failure. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) is golden standard for MET amp detection, while next-generation sequencing (NGS) was widely used in clinical practice. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) was also an alternative method for MET amp detection in plasma. The concordance of NGS and ddPCR vs FISH for MET amp detection in these pts needs to be validated.

Methods

EGFRm NSCLC pts post 1L osi progression were prospectively enrolled with paired tissue and blood. MET amp was tested by FISH and NGS in tissue and by ddPCR and NGS in plasma. Tissue NGS assay was optimized in this study with new MET gene copy number (GCN) cut-off of 8.63. Taking MET GCN≥10 by FISH as high level MET amp positive based on the SAVANNAH study, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MET amp detection was analyzed in NGS (tissue and plasma), optimized NGS (tissue), and ddPCR (plasma) vs FISH.

Results

Thirty-six pts were tested MET amp by FISH, NGS and ddPCR. The prevalence of MET amp by FISH (GCN≥10) was 13.9%. The concordance in different platforms was shown in the table. In tissue, optimized NGS showed improved specificity (71.0% vs 100%) and accuracy (75.0% vs 100%) compared to NGS with non-optimized, maintaining high sensitivity 100%. In plasma, ddPCR presented higher sensitivity (100% vs 40.0%) and accuracy (94.4% vs 88.9%) with similar specificity (93.6% vs 96.8%) Table: 677P

Concordance of MET amp

Sample Methods (vs FISH) Sensitivity (%) Specificity (%) PPV (%) NPV (%) Accuracy (%)
Tissue Non-optimized NGS 100 71.0 35.7 100 75.0
Optimized NGS 100 100 100 100 100
Plasma NGS 40.0 96.8 66.7 90.9 88.9
ddPCR 100 93.6 71.4 100 94.4
.

Conclusions

In tissue, optimized NGS is an acceptable method for MET amp detection in EGFRm advanced NSCLC pts post osi 1L failure. Plasma is an alternative sample for MET amp testing when tissue is unavailable. Further validation is needed by studies with larger sample size.

Clinical trial identification

NCT05219162.

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing and editorial support were provided by Hangzhou Tigermed Consulting Co., Ltd.

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca China.

Funding

AstraZeneca China.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.