Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

530P - Comparison of hyperbaric oxygen therapy and long intestinal tube therapy for postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction in gastrointestinal cancer patients

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Shunya Goto

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1595-S1615. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1695

Authors

S. Goto, H. Imada, M. Hosoda, Y. Okabe, A. Kimura, H. Ohno, S. Marshall, T. Ogawa

Author affiliations

  • Internal Medicine, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Adachi Medical Center, 123-8558 - Adachi-ku/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 530P

Background

Adhesive small bowel obstruction (ASBO) is a common complication of gastrointestinal cancer surgery. Treatment includes intestinal decompression with a long intestinal tube (LIT), surgery, and hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). While the insertion of a long intestinal tube is a burdensome procedure for both patients and medical staff, HBOT has the advantage of requiring only bed rest in the device, which is less invasive. However, HBOT has not yet been reported in clinical practice. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of HBOT on postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction in gastrointestinal cancer patients.

Methods

This double-center retrospective study enrolled 110 gastrointestinal cancer patients with postoperative ASBO between January 2012 and March 2023. Patients were divided into the HBOT group and the LIT group. We examined non-per os period, hospital stay, and clinical course. These factors were analyzed by propensity score matching because Hospitals A and B were located in different regions and had different hospital functions.

Results

Of 78 patients in the HBOT group and 32 patients in the LIT group, 71 (91%) and 29 (90%), respectively, responded to treatment. 7 patients in the HBOT group had a long intestinal tube inserted without improvement, and 2 of them were transferred to surgery. 2 patients had to be withdrawn due to discomfort in the HBOT device. 3 patients in the LIT group underwent surgery. Before matching, the period of non-per os was significantly shorter in the HBOT group (Mean 6.0 days, SD±3.8) than that of the LIT group (Mean 9.6 days, SD±8.0) (p<0.01). After matching, 23 patients in each group were matched. There was no significant difference in the period of non-per os between the HBOT group (Mean 8.3 days, SD±4.7) and the long intestinal tube group (Mean 9.4 days, SD±9.1).

Conclusions

HBOT for postoperative adhesive small bowel obstruction in patients with gastrointestinal is as effective as LIT therapy, and considering the patient burden, HBOT may be an effective treatment option.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.