Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

584P - Comparison of efficacy of single agent netupitant plus palonosetron (NEPA) vs fosaprepitant in prevention of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in patients receiving high dose chemotherapy for auto-SCT In a tertiary care center from South India

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

sunil chillalshetti

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1595-S1615. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1695

Authors

S. chillalshetti

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, 560029 - Bangalore/IN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 584P

Background

Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) remains important and distressing adverse effect in patients receiving high dose chemotherapy as conditioning regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (Auto-SCT) . Failure to appreciate scope of this issue and implement effective anti-emetic regimen contributes to poorer compliance and treatment outcomes. This study determines the effectiveness of single agent NEPA & fosaprepitant in patients undergoing Auto-SCT at our center.

Methods

Materials and methods – This prospective study includes eligible cases of Multiple myeloma (MM), relapsed Hodgkin’s lymphoma (HL) and Non Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) who underwent Auto-SCT from June -2022 to June – 2024. Patients were randomized by block randomization method to receive single agent NEPA and fosaprepitant as anti-emetic prophylaxis before administering high dose conditioning regimens. Responses were recorded using standard visual analogue scale during acute (<24hrs), delayed (24–120 hrs) and overall (0-120 hrs) phases.

Results

We enrolled 40 patients, median age 38 yrs (range : 18—59) all with diagnosis of MM (n=31), Relapsed HL(n=8) and NHL (n=1). As part of conditioning regimen, high dose melphalan and BEAM regimen were used in 31 and 9 patients respectively. The complete response rates in acute phase (CR-AP) was 65.0 % and 66.7 % while complete response rates in delayed phase (CR- DP) was 45.7% and 55.6% in fosaprepitant and NEPA arms respectively. The overall complete response (CR-O) was also higher in NEPA arm (77.8 % vs 60%).

Conclusions

Single agent oral NEPA is more effective in preventing CINV in acute, delayed, overall phases in patients receiving high dose chemotherapy as conditioning regimen for Auto-SCT. Keywords - NEPA, fosaprepitant, Auto-SCT, chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting, complete response.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology.

Funding

Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology.

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.