Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

470P - Collusion, coping and concerns between advanced cancer patients and their family caregivers: A single-centre study in a specialist palliative care setting

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Parth Jha

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1575-S1579. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1693

Authors

P.S. Jha1, J. Deodhar2, S. Poojary3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Palliative Medicine, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Tata Memorial Hospital, 400012 - Mumbai/IN
  • 2 Palliative Medicine And Psycho-oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, 400012 - Mumbai/IN
  • 3 Palliative Medicine Dept., Tata Memorial Hospital - Parel, 400004 - Mumbai/IN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 470P

Background

Studies report that almost 50% cancer patients are uninformed of their diagnosis or prognosis, and these rates are significantly higher in palliative care settings. We aimed to examine the presence of collusion and associated coping strategies and concerns of advanced cancer patients and their caregivers (CGs), in an outpatient specialist palliative care clinic (SPC).

Methods

We retrospectively analysed the assessment records of adult advanced cancer patients, newly referred to our SPC clinic from Jan to March 2024. We noted the demographic, clinical, diagnosis and prognosis awareness, coping and concerns reported by patients and CGs. Incomplete records were excluded. Descriptive and association measures were used for the analysis.

Results

Medical records of 100 patients were included in the study. Of these, 53 were male and 50 were on disease directed treatment. CGs were mainly male (57) and children of the patients (49). Collusion regarding diagnosis was present in 35 and regarding prognosis in 65 of patient-caregiver dyads. Place of residence significantly affected collusion; with patients whose domicile was out of state having collusion 80%. Seeking support and problem solving were the main coping strategies used by both patients and their CGs. More caregivers than patients had concerns about treatment (26 vs 13), symptoms (15 vs 13) and finances (20 vs 9). We noted a difference in themes reported by patients (uncertainty and dependency) and CGs (healthcare access, decision-making and financial burden).

Conclusions

Our study revealed a high prevalence of collusion in disclosing prognosis in caregiver-patient dyads, which was associated with place of residence. Although concerns differed, both patients and caregivers sought practical coping strategies. Future research needs to be undertaken about specific sociocultural, spiritual religious factors influencing collusion in in a multicultural, multifaith country like India.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.