Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

248P - Clinicopathological profile and outcomes of neuroendocrine tumors: Data from a multicenter collaborative registry in India

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Soumya Surath Panda

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

S.S. Panda1, S. Meedimale1, L. Moharana2, S. Kayal3, B. Dubashi4, K.K. Rathnam5, S.V. Saju5, A. Sehrawat6, D. Sundriyal7, A. Singh8, S.L. Cyriac9, A.O. Philips10, P. Kinslely11, K.B. Priya12, D. Halanaik13, B. A14, K. Raja15, S. Bh16, S. Natarajan13, P. Ganesan4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, IMS & SUM Hospital SOA University, 751003 - Bhubaneswar/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology Dept., IMS & SUM Hospital, 751003 - Bhubaneswar/IN
  • 3 Medical Oncology Department, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 4 Medical Oncology Dept., JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 5 Medical Oncology Department, Meenakshi Mission Hospital and Research Centre, 625107 - Madurai/IN
  • 6 Medical Oncology Department, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Science Rishikesh, 249203 - Rishikesh/IN
  • 7 Medical Oncology And Hematology Department, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Science Rishikesh, 249203 - Rishikesh/IN
  • 8 Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, 249 203 - Rishikesh/IN
  • 9 Medical Oncology And Haematology, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, 680555 - Thrissur/IN
  • 10 Medical Oncology Department, Amala Institute of Medical Sciences, 680555 - Thrissur/IN
  • 11 Medical Oncology, Christian Medical College & Hospital, 141008 - Ludhiana/IN
  • 12 Medical Oncology Department, Apolo Hospital, 143001 - Amritsar/IN
  • 13 Medical Oncology, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 14 Department Of Surgical Oncology, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 15 Department Of Surgical Gastroenterology, JIPMER - Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605006 - Puducherry/IN
  • 16 Department Of Pathology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, 605 006 - Puducherry/IN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 248P

Background

Clinicopathological features and outcomes of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) differ from those observed in Western populations and vary across Indian states. There is limited data regarding the same from India.This study was done by the Network of Oncology Clinical Trials of India (NOCI), a BIRAC-funded network, that aims to fill this gap from a multicentric perspective.

Methods

Data of patients with NETs [ Grade (Gr)- 1, 2, 3 (Well differentiated); NEC was excluded] registered at six centers in India between January 2018 and December 2022 were collected from patient records (retrospectively). We collected details regarding their sociodemographic profiles, histopathology, treatment, and outcomes (progression-free survival, PFS).

Results

Out of the 174 patients (median age: 52 years, 63% male) of NETs treated during the study period, 85.6% (n=149) were gastroenteropancreatic (GEP-NETs). Of these, 27.5% and 24.7% of patients had primary tumors in the small intestine and pancreas, respectively, with abdominal pain as the most common presenting symptom (56.3 %).Gr2 was commonest (n=51)>Gr1 (n=48)>Gr3 (n=25). Grading was unavailable in 50 (28%) patients. Over 70% of patients had metastatic disease, (liver (53.2 %)> lung (11.4 %)> bone (10.6%). Only 34% of patients had upfront surgery. Long-acting octreotide (28.5 %), platinum+etoposide (24 %), Capecitabine+Temozolomide (10.3%) were commonly used, and 11.4% of patients received peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The median PFS was lower in Gr3 patients (12 months) when compared to Gr2 (15 months), and Gr1 (19 months). Patients with liver metastasis had better survival (18 months) when compared to those with bone (16 months), and lung (15 months); p= 0.037. Table: 248P

Grade Localized disease (mPFS) p-value Metastatic disease (mPFS) p-value Independent of disease spread p-value
Gr 1 22 mts 0.308 16 mts 0.055 19 mts 0.015
Gr 2 15 mts 15 mts 15 mts
Gr 3 12 mts 11 mts 12 mts
Gr unknown 16 mts 19 mts 18 mts
.

Conclusions

In one of the largest series of NETs from India, we note that GEP-NETs are the commonest, and grade remains the most important prognostic factor. Very few patients have access to PRRT, and most of them receive only chemotherapy agents.

Clinical trial identification

CTRI/2022/01/039233.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Biotechnology Industry Research Assistance Council (BIRAC).

Disclosure

S.S. Panda: Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: BIRAC. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.