Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

663P - Cisplatin (CDDP)+Etoposide (ETP)+Durvalumab (DUR) vs. Carboplatin (CBDCA)+ETP+Atezolizumab (ATZ): Propensity score matching (PSM) real-world data (RWD) on CDDP-fit extensive disease (ED)-small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Kosuke Hamai

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1632-S1678. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1698

Authors

K. Hamai1, K. Hirano2, A. Hata3, Y. Yamanaka4, T. Sumi5, Y. Sato6, Y. Oya7, N. Katakami8, K. Iwasaki9, T. Uenishi9, K. Kokubo10

Author affiliations

  • 1 Respiratory Medicine, Ja Onomichi General Hospital, 722-8508 - Onomichi/JP
  • 2 Respiratory Oncology, Kobe Minimally Invasive Cancer Center, 650-0046 - Kobe/JP
  • 3 Division Of Thoracic Oncology, Kobe Minimally Invasive Cancer Center, 650-0046 - Kobe/JP
  • 4 Department Of Thoracic Oncology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Kansai Medical University, 573-1191 - Hirakata/JP
  • 5 Respiratory Medicine, Hakodate Goryoukaku Hospital, 040-0001 - Hakodate/JP
  • 6 Department Of Respiratory Medicine, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, 650-0047 - Kobe/JP
  • 7 Department Of Respiratory Medicine, Fujita Health University, 470-1192 - Toyoake/JP
  • 8 Medical Oncoloty Department, Takarazuka City Hospital, 665-0827 - Takarazuka/JP
  • 9 N/a, Healthcare Consulting, Inc., 102-7701 - Tokyo/JP
  • 10 N/a, Nishogakusha University, 102-8336 - Tokyo/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 663P

Background

Chemotherapies combined with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (Chemo-ICIs) are the standard of care in first-line therapy for ED-SCLC. Although there is no comparative data on ATZ vs. DUR, their efficacies appear to be equivalent based on results from IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials. DUR can be administered with either CDDP or CBDCA, whereas ATZ only with CBDCA. Although CDDP is conventionally considered more effective in CDDP-fit patients (pts), little is known in combined with ICIs.

Methods

This is an exploratory analysis on multicenter retrospective study of RWD. Clinical outcomes of ED-SCLC pts who had received Chemo-ICIs were collected from electronic medical records of each hospital. After excluding poor PS and Ccr <60 ml/min pts, PSM was performed to adjust difference of pts' backgrounds of two groups (DUR-G vs. ATZ-G).

Results

From August 2018 to December 2022, 274 pts (DUR/ATZ: 98/176) were extracted from 8 hospitals in Japan. Among 128 pts with both PS 0-1 and Ccr ³60, 31 pts received CDDP+ETP+DUR, and 98 CBDCA+ETP+ATZ. After PSM, total 50 pts: 25 pts in each group were evaluated. Response rate was 88.0% for DUR-G and 76.0% for ATZ-G (p=0.463). Median overall survivals of DUR-G vs. ATZ-G were 21.4 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 14.0-not reached [NR]) vs. 19.8 (95% CI: 12.2-NR) months, respectively (p=0.490). Median progression-free survivals of DUR-G vs. ATZ-G were 5.6 (95% CI: 5.1-7.5) vs. 4.7 (95% CI: 4.3-6.5) months, respectively (p=0.500). Median time to treatment failures of DUR-G vs. ATZ-G were 4.9 (95% CI: 4.1-11.0) vs. 4.7 (95% CI: 4.2-6.5) months, respectively (p=0.907). No significant safety differences: immune-related adverse events (AEs) ³grade 2; (20% vs. 12%); any grade interstitial lung disease (8% vs. 4%); febrile neutropenia (8% vs. 8%); serious AEs (8% vs. 16%); and number of hospitalizations (median/mean: 2/2.3 vs. 1/1.7) were observed.

Conclusions

Our RWD found a similar effectiveness of CDDP+ETP+DUR vs. CBDCA+ETP+ATZ in CDDP-fit ED-SCLC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

K. Hamai: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: AstraZeneca. A. Hata: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Eli Lilly, Chugai Pharamceutical, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Taiho, MSD, Boehringer Ingelheim. N. Katakami: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Bristol Myers Squibb, MSD, Chugai Pharmaceutical, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Taiho, Kyowa Kirin, Kyorin, Takeda, Ono Pharmaceutical. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.