Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

146P - A retrospective study of the efficacy of gemcitabine combined with capecitabine versus capecitabine alone for biliary tract cancer after curative resection

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jiaman Ma

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_4): S1450-S1504. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1688

Authors

J. Ma, Y. Yang

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Medical Oncology And Division Of Abdominal Tumor Multimodality Treatment, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, 610041 - Chengdu/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 146P

Background

Biliary tract cancers (BTC) is characterized by insidious onset, aggressiveness and poor prognosis. Surgery is the first recommended treatment for patients with early-stage BTC, and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine is the current standard of treatment. However, the 2-year recurrence rate after capecitabine adjuvant chemotherapy is still as high as approximately 50% (median relapse free survival(mRFS): 24.4 months).

Methods

This is a retrospective study that collected clinical data from patients who were diagnosed with BTC and underwent radical resection with pathologic type of adenocarcinoma and who used adjuvant chemotherapeutic regimen of gemcitabine plus capecitabine (GEMCAP) or capecitabine (CAP) postoperatively in our hospital from May 2017 to May 2023. The main study index was RFS.

Results

302 patients with BTC received postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, 123 cases with GEMCAP regimen and 179 cases with CAP regimen. (ICC=153 cases, pCCA=65 cases, dCCA=33 cases and GBC =51 cases). The median follow-up time was 30.2 months. The mRFS in the GEMCAP group was significantly better than that in the CAP group (25.2 months vs. 16.6 months, HR=0.700, 95% CI: 0.513-0.957, P=0.024). In further RFS subgroup analyses, the GEMCAP group showed consistent benefit or trend toward benefit compared to the CAP group in almost all clinicopathologic characteristic subgroups. Survival analysis after PSM showed that mRFS in the GEMCAP group remained significantly better than that in the CAP group (25.2 months vs. 14.0 months, HR=0.615, 95% CI: 0.433 to 0.873, P=0.006). In terms of overall survival, the data for both groups are not yet mature enough to obtain a median survival time.

Conclusions

This retrospective study showed that adjuvant chemotherapy with the GEMCAP regimen significantly prolong the RFS of postoperative patients with BTC compared to the CAP regimen, which is currently the standard postoperative adjuvant regimen. Therefore, the GEMCAP regimen may be a superior adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for postoperative BTC patients and deserves further investigation in a stage III stage clinical trial.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.