Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

YO17 - A case of adult-onset malignant rhabdoid tumor of kidney responded to VAC therapy

Date

07 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ikuhiro Kita

Authors

I. Kita1, Y. Okita1, Y. Tahara2, A. Murakami1, H. Okuyama3, A. Tsuji4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine/Graduate School of Medicine, 761-0793 - Miki/JP
  • 2 Oncology Dept., Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine/Graduate School of Medicine, 761-0793 - Miki/JP
  • 3 Clinical Oncology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine/Graduate School of Medicine, 761-0793 - Miki/JP
  • 4 Department Of Clinical Oncology, Kagawa University Faculty of Medicine/Graduate School of Medicine, 761-0793 - Miki/JP

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract YO17

Case summary

BACKGROUND

Malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) is a pediatric tumor with a poor prognosis that can occur at any site, including the kidney and central nervous system, and there are no established treatment. Only 11 cases have been reported in adults, and the average survival time was approximately 7 months. Most patients who underwent surgical resection as initial treatment relapse within one year after surgery, so that is important to establish a treatment. We report here a case of primary renal MRT in adult patient that responded to VAC (vincristine + actinomycin D + cyclophosphamide) therapy.

CASE

A 47-year-old man with a 7 cm tumor in his left kidney detected on CT scan underwent a laparoscopic left nephrectomy. Pathological examination revealed rhabdoid-like cells and poor staining of SMARKB1/INI1, diagnosing primary renal MRT. The patient was received one cycle of VAC therapy and a contrast-enhanced CT scan showed a clear reduction of contrast effect in the recurrent mass. After three cycles of VAC therapy, the patient is still alive without disease progression and being considered surgical treatment for the abdominal mass.

CONCLUSIONS

MRT often occur in infancy, and despite multidisciplinary treatment combining surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the prognosis is poor and there is no established treatment. The efficacy of the same treatment as rhabdomyosarcoma has been reported, and VAC therapy was showed response in this case. There have been no reports of VAC therapy in adult patients with MRT, and we believe that it may be a treatment option in the future. Although the comprehensive genomic profiling test performed in this case showed no genetic alterations, SMARCB1 gene alterations have been highly reported in MRT. There are some reports suggesting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in SMARCB1 deficient tumors, expected to be an additional treatment option for MRT.

Clinical trial identification

BACKGROUND: Malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) is a pediatric tumor with a poor prognosis that can occur at any site, including the kidney and central nervous system, and there are no established treatment. Only 11 cases have been reported in adults, and the average survival time was approximately 7 months. Most patients who underwent surgical resection as initial treatment relapse within one year after surgery, so that is important to establish a treatment. We report here a case of primary renal MRT in adult patient that responded to VAC (vincristine + actinomycin D + cyclophosphamide) therapy.

CASE: A 47-year-old man with a 7 cm tumor in his left kidney detected on CT scan underwent a laparoscopic left nephrectomy. Pathological examination revealed rhabdoid-like cells and poor staining of SMARKB1/INI1, diagnosing primary renal MRT. The patient was received one cycle of VAC therapy and a contrast-enhanced CT scan showed a clear reduction of contrast effect in the recurrent mass. After three cycles of VAC therapy, the patient is still alive without disease progression and being considered surgical treatment for the abdominal mass.

CONCLUSIONS: MRT often occur in infancy, and despite multidisciplinary treatment combining surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, the prognosis is poor and there is no established treatment. The efficacy of the same treatment as rhabdomyosarcoma has been reported, and VAC therapy was showed response in this case. There have been no reports of VAC therapy in adult patients with MRT, and we believe that it may be a treatment option in the future. Although the comprehensive genomic profiling test performed in this case showed no genetic alterations, SMARCB1 gene alterations have been highly reported in MRT. There are some reports suggesting the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in SMARCB1 deficient tumors, expected to be an additional treatment option for MRT.

Editorial acknowledgement

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.