Abstract 197P
Background
This study aimed to investigate characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of Chinese patients with UAM GA/GEJA in real-world settings.
Methods
This was a multicenter, retrospective, observational study using electronic medical records from four tertiary hospitals. Adult patients who were diagnosed with UAM GA/GEJA between Jan 1, 2017 and Dec 31, 2020 and had ≥1 inpatient admission related to UAM GA/GEJA from diagnosis to Aug 31, 2021 were included. Descriptive statistics were applied to summarize the data and Kaplan- Meier method was used to describe duration of treatment (DoT) and progression-free survival (PFS) by each line of therapy.
Results
Of the 2,745 eligible patients (median age 62 years, 69.2% male), 97.3% had a diagnosis of GA, 94.0% had stage IV disease, and 43.4% had peritoneum metastasis at diagnosis. Of the 2,745 patients, 1,902 (69.3%) received first-line (1L) therapy. Of the 1,902 patients, 729 (38.3%) subsequently received second-line (2L) therapy and 284 (14.9%) received third-line (3L) therapy. The majority of patients received chemotherapy alone in 1L and 2L settings (84.1% in 1L, 63.6% in 2L, 41.4% in 3L). Targeted therapy-based regimen (13.7% in 1L, 30.3% in 2L, 49.2% in 3L) and immunotherapy-based regimen (3.1% in 1L, 8.7% in 2L, 18.5% in 3L) were used more often in 3L setting. The most frequently used treatment regimen in 1L, 2L, and 3L were fluoropyrimidine (FP) plus platinum (44.5%), FP plus taxanes (16.5%), and anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors alone (18.2%), respectively. Median (95% CI) DoT (4.4 months [4.2, 4.8] in 1L, 3.1 months [2.7, 3.6] in 2L, 2.4 months [2.0, 2.9] in 3L) and PFS (6.5 months [6.1, 6.9] in 1L, 4.2 months [3.7, 4.5] in 2L, 3.2 months [2.8, 3.7] in 3L) decreased progressively with each advancing line of therapy.
Conclusions
Patients treated in 1L and 2L mainly received chemotherapy alone at that time. DoT and PFS were generally short in all lines of therapy, which suggests the need for more effective new treatment options.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Eli Lilly and Company.
Funding
Eli Lilly and Company.
Disclosure
G. Segall, L. Zhou, C. Zhou, M. Khanal: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: Eli Lilly and Company; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Eli Lilly and Company. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
602P - COLUMBUS 7-year update: A randomized, open-label, phase III trial of encorafenib (Enco) + binimetinib (Bini) vs vemurafenib (Vemu) or Enco in patients (Pts) with BRAF V600-mutant melanoma
Presenter: Andrew Haydon
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
603P - An individualised postoperative radiological surveillance schedule for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma patients (HK-GBM Registry)
Presenter: Jason Chak Yan Li
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
604P - Cabozantinib versus placebo in patients with radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer who progressed after prior VEGFR-targeted therapy: Outcomes from COSMIC-311 by BRAF status
Presenter: Marcia Brose
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
606P - BRAF and NRAS mutations are associated with poor prognosis in Asians with acral-lentiginous and nodular cutaneous melanoma
Presenter: Sumadi Lukman Anwar
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
607P - Single institutional outcomes of radiotherapy and systemic therapy for melanoma brain metastases in Japan
Presenter: Naoya Yamazaki
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
608P - The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy in mucosal melanomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Andrea Teo
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
609P - The association between thyroid function abnormalities and vitiligo induced by pembrolizumab regarding prognosis in patients with advanced melanoma
Presenter: Moez Mobarek
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
610P - Analyzing the clinical benefit of the evidence presented at these congresses and utilizing a standardized scale to quantify it will significantly enhance our understanding of the studies showcased, allowing for more objective evaluation and interpretation
Presenter: Charles Jeffrey Tan
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
611P - ESMO-magnitude of clinical benefit scale (MCBS) scores for phase III trials of adjuvant and curative therapies at the 2022 ASCO annual meeting (ASCO22)
Presenter: Thi Thao Vi Luong
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract
612P - Is the juice worth the squeeze? Overall survival gain per unit treatment time as a metric of clinical benefit of systemic treatment in incurable cancers
Presenter: Vodathi Bamunuarachchi
Session: Poster Display
Resources:
Abstract